...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics: Official Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics >Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants Employed by General and Subspecialty Pediatricians.
【24h】

Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants Employed by General and Subspecialty Pediatricians.

机译:普通和专科儿科医生聘用的护士从业人员和医师助理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: There is little nationally representative information describing the current manner in which nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) work in pediatric practices and their professional activities. To understand better the current NP and PA workforce in pediatric primary and subspecialty care, we conducted a national survey of pediatricians. METHODS: A survey study of a random national sample of 498 pediatric generalists and 1696 subspecialists in the United States was performed by using a structured questionnaire administered by mail. The survey focused on practice settings, employment, and scope of work of NPs and PAs. RESULTS: Response rates were 72% for generalists and 77% for subspecialists. More than one-half (55%) of generalists reported that they do not currently work with NPs or PAs, compared with only one-third of subspecialists who do not. Many generalists and subspecialists intend to increase the number of NPs and PAs in their practices in the next 5 years. More generalist and subspecialty practices work with NPs than with PAs. There was great variability between generalists and subspecialists and among different subspecialties in the proportions that worked with NPs and PAs. The scope of work of NPs and PAs also varied between generalists and subspecialists. CONCLUSIONS: Planned increases in the number of NPs hired and expansion of their scope of work might put subspecialists and general pediatricians in competition with regard to recruitment and hiring of a limited pool of new pediatric NPs. Similar issues might arise with PAs.
机译:目的:几乎没有全国性的代表性信息来描述护士执业者(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)从事儿科实践及其专业活动的当前方式。为了更好地了解儿科基层和亚专科护理领域当前的NP和PA劳动力,我们进行了一次全国儿科医生调查。方法:采用结构化问卷调查方式,对美国498名儿科专科医生和1696名亚专科医生的全国性随机样本进行了调查研究。该调查侧重于NP和PA的实践设置,就业和工作范围。结果:通才的回应率为72%,专科的回应率为77%。超过半数(55%)的通才医生表示,他们目前不使用NP或PA,而只有三分之一的非专科医生不使用。许多通才和亚专科医生打算在未来5年内增加NP和PA的数量。与PA相比,与NP相比,与NP相比,更多的通才和亚专业实践。通才和副专家之间以及在不同副专业之间,在使用NP和PA的比例方面存在很大差异。 NP和PA的工作范围在通才和副专家之间也有所不同。结论:计划中的NP聘用人数的增加和工作范围的扩大可能会使专科医师和普通儿科医生在招募和雇用有限的新儿科NP方面处于竞争状态。 PA可能会出现类似的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号