首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Aerosol delivery to non-ventilated infants by metered dose inhaler: should a valved spacer be used?
【24h】

Aerosol delivery to non-ventilated infants by metered dose inhaler: should a valved spacer be used?

机译:通过定量吸入器将气雾剂输送至非通风的婴儿:是否应使用带阀的垫片?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a randomized double-blind cross-over study on 20 spontaneously breathing, oxygen-dependent preterm infants who had received positive pressure ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, we tested the hypothesis that the one-way non-rebreathing valves of aerosol spacer devices might impair rather than enhance the delivery of aerosols to small infants by metered dose inhalers (MDI). Ten infants were given 2 doses (200 micrograms/dose) of MDI albuterol through a neonatal Aerochamber 4 h apart. At random sequence, one dose was delivered with the non-rebreathing valve of the Aerochamber in place; for the other dose, the valve had been removed. The experiment was repeated on another ten infants using a different spacer device (Babyhaler) with or without its one-way inspiratory valve removed. During the first hour following aerosol administration, use of the non-valved spacers was associated with a significantly greater degree of tachycardia in both groups, and also lower transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension in the Aerochamber group. All infants showed a reduction in respiratory system resistance and an improvement in functional residual capacity following albuterol treatment. In both groups, maximum reduction in respiratory system resistance, recorded 30 min after aerosol delivery, was significantly greater following the use of the non-valved spacers (Aerochamber: 51.2 +/- 3.1% vs. 35.0 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.0001; Babyhaler: 38.8 +/- 2.3% vs. 19.2 +/- 1.4%, P < 0.0001) than following the use of the spacers with a valve. The findings provide indirect evidence supporting our hypothesis and suggest that when the MDI is used to deliver therapeutic aerosols to non-ventilated newborns or small infants, a spacer device without a non-rebreathing valve should be used.
机译:在一项随机双盲交叉研究中,对20名因呼吸窘迫综合征而接受正压通气的自发呼吸,依赖氧气的早产儿进行了检验,我们检验了以下假设:气溶胶间隔装置的单向非呼吸阀可能会损害而不是通过计量吸入器(MDI)增强向小婴儿的气雾剂输送。十名婴儿通过间隔4小时的新生儿Aerochamber接受2剂量(200微克/剂量)的MDI沙丁胺醇。按照随机顺序,在Aerochamber的无呼吸阀就位的情况下提供一剂;对于其他剂量,已将瓣膜取下。使用不同的隔离装置(Babyhaler),在有或没有其单向吸气阀的情况下,对另外十名婴儿进行了重复实验。在气雾剂给药后的第一个小时内,两组均使用非阀隔片与心动过速明显增加有关,而Aerochamber组的经皮二氧化碳张力也较低。沙丁胺醇治疗后,所有婴儿均表现出呼吸系统抵抗力降低和功能残余能力改善。在两组中,气雾剂递送后30分钟记录的呼吸系统阻力的最大降低在使用非阀隔片之后明显更大(气室:51.2 +/- 3.1%与35.0 +/- 2.8%,P < 0.0001; Babyhaler:38.8 +/- 2.3%vs. 19.2 +/- 1.4%,P <0.0001)比使用带阀的隔圈要好。这些发现提供了支持我们假说的间接证据,并建议当MDI用于将治疗性气雾剂输送给未通风的新生儿或婴儿时,应使用不带呼吸阀的隔离装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号