首页> 外文期刊>Particulate Science and Technology: An International Journal >Measurement of Bulk Mechanical Properities and Modeling the Load-Response of Rootzone Sands. Part 1: Round and Angular Monosize and Binary Mixtures
【24h】

Measurement of Bulk Mechanical Properities and Modeling the Load-Response of Rootzone Sands. Part 1: Round and Angular Monosize and Binary Mixtures

机译:块体力学性能的测量和根区砂的载荷响应模型。第1部分:圆形和角形单色混合和二进制混合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The bulk mechanical properties of two different types of rootzone sands(round and angular) were measured using a cubical triaxial tester. Two monosize sands (d-(50)0.375mm and 0.675 mm) and their 50:50 binary mixtures (d_(50)=0.500 mm) were studied . The compression, shear,and failure responses of the above-mentioned six compositions were analyzed, compared,and modeled. Two elastic parameters(bulk and shear moduli) and two elastoplastic parameters (swelling and consolidation indices ) of the six sand compositions were also calculated and compared. The angular sand was more compressible than round sand during isotropic compression .In addition, the angular sands tended to have lower initial bulk density and high porosity values. Among the three different size fractions, the 0.75 mm mixture was least compressible for both sand shapesl The failure strength and shear modulus of the angular sand wer higher than the round sands. Inaddition , due to their simplicity , phenomenological models were developed to predict the compression and shear behavior of the sands. The prediction models wer validated using subangular and subround sands. Average relative difference values were calculated to determine the effectivencess fo the prediction models.The mean average relative difference values for compression profiles, i.e.,volumetric stress vs. volumetric strain , were from 16% to 39% , except for the initial load-response protion (<1% volumertric strain). The predictive models were effective in reproducing the failure responses: at 17.2 kPa confining pressure the mean of average relative difference was 23% , at 34.5 kPa , the mean difference was 24%
机译:使用立方三轴测试仪测量了两种不同类型的根区砂(圆形和角形)的整体力学性能。研究了两种单色砂(d-(50)0.375mm和0.675mm)及其50:50二元混合物(d_(50)= 0.500mm)。分析,比较和建模了上述六种组合物的压缩,剪切和破坏响应。计算并比较了六个砂组合物的两个弹性参数(体弹性模量和剪切模量)和两个弹塑性参数(溶胀指数和固结指数)。在各向同性压缩过程中,角砂比圆形砂更易压缩。此外,角砂的初始堆积密度较低,孔隙率较高。在三种不同尺寸的组分中,两种砂型的0.75 mm混合物的可压缩性最低。角砂的破坏强度和剪切模量高于圆砂。此外,由于其简单性,开发了现象学模型来预测砂土的压缩和剪切行为。预测模型将使用亚角和亚圆形砂进行验证。计算平均相对差值,以确定预测模型的有效性。压缩曲线的平均平均相对差值,即体积应力与体积应变,从16%到39%,除了初始的载荷响应比例(<1%体积应变)。预测模型有效地再现了故障响应:在17.2 kPa围压下,平均相对差的平均值为23%,在34.5 kPa时,平均差值为24%

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号