...
首页> 外文期刊>Paleobiology >Gizzard vs. teeth, it's a tie: Food-processing efficiency in herbivorous birds and mammals and implications for dinosaur feeding strategies
【24h】

Gizzard vs. teeth, it's a tie: Food-processing efficiency in herbivorous birds and mammals and implications for dinosaur feeding strategies

机译:izz与牙齿息息相关:草食性鸟类和哺乳动物的食品加工效率及其对恐龙喂养策略的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Particle size reduction is a primary means of improving efficiency in herbivores. The mode of food particle size reduction is one of the main differences between herbivorous birds (gizzard) and mammals (teeth). For a quantitative comparison of the efficiency of food comminution, we investigated mean fecal particle sizes (MPS) in 14 herbivorous bird species and compared these with a data set of 111 non-ruminant herbivorous mammal species. In general MPS increased with body mass, but there was no significant difference between birds and mammals, suggesting a comparable efficiency of food processing by gizzards and chewing teeth. The results lead to the intriguing question of why gizzard systems have evolved comparatively rarely among amniote herbivores. Advantages linked to one of the two food comminution systems must, however, be sought in different effects other than size reduction itself. In paleoecological scenarios, the evolution of "dental batteries," for example in ornithopod dinosaurs, should be considered an advantage compared to absence of mastication, but not compared to gizzard-based herbivory.
机译:减小粒度是提高食草动物效率的主要手段。减少食物粒度的方式是食草鸟类(izz)和哺乳动物(牙齿)之间的主要区别之一。为了定量比较食物粉碎的效率,我们调查了14种草食性鸟类的平均粪便粒径(MPS),并将其与111种非反刍类草食哺乳动物的数据集进行了比较。总的来说,MPS随着体重增加而增加,但是鸟类和哺乳动物之间没有显着差异,这表明g和咀嚼食物的加工效率相当。结果引出了一个有趣的问题,为什么在羊膜草食动物中izz的系统很少进化。然而,除了减小尺寸本身以外,还必须以不同的效果寻求与两种食物粉碎系统之一相关的优势。在古生态环境中,与没有咀嚼的情况相比,例如在鸟脚类恐龙中的“齿状电池”的进化应被认为是一种优势,但与基于izz的食草相比则没有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号