首页> 外文期刊>Patient education and counseling >A response to: Veldhuijzen et al., Communication guidelines as a learning tool: An exploration of user preferences in general practice [Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90(2): 213]
【24h】

A response to: Veldhuijzen et al., Communication guidelines as a learning tool: An exploration of user preferences in general practice [Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90(2): 213]

机译:回应:Veldhuijzen等人,“交流准则作为一种学习工具:在一般实践中对用户偏好的探索” [Patient Educ Couns 2013; 90(2):213]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read the article "Communication guidelines as a learning tool: An exploration of user preferences in general practice" [1] with interest and were delighted that our work is mentioned so prominently within the article. However, we would like to comment on the authors' description of the Calgary Cambridge guides which we do not recognise and which leads to incorrect statements within the discussion.
机译:我们饶有兴趣地阅读了文章“作为一种学习工具的通信准则:在一般实践中对用户偏好的探索” [1],并且很高兴在本文中如此突出地提及了我们的工作。但是,我们想对作者对卡尔加里剑桥指南的描述发表评论,我们对此并不认识,并导致讨论中的陈述不正确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号