...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Effectiveness of the palliative care 'Availability, Current issues and Anticipation' (ACA) communication training programme for general practitioners on patient outcomes: A controlled trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of the palliative care 'Availability, Current issues and Anticipation' (ACA) communication training programme for general practitioners on patient outcomes: A controlled trial

机译:针对全科医生对患者预后的姑息治疗“可用性,当前问题和预期”(ACA)交流培训计划的有效性:一项对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Although communicating effectively with patients receiving palliative care can be difficult, it may contribute to maintaining or enhancing patients' quality of life. Little is known about the effect of training general practitioners in palliative care-specific communication. We hypothesized that palliative care patients of general practitioners exposed to the 'Availability, Current issues and Anticipation' communication training programme would report better outcomes than patients of control general practitioners. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation training programme for general practitioners on patient-reported outcomes. Design: In a controlled trial, general practitioners followed the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation programme or were part of the control group. Patients receiving palliative care of participating general practitioners completed the Palliative Care Outcome Scale, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative, the Rest & Peace Scale, the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III and the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation Scale, at baseline and 12 months follow-up. We analysed differences between groups using linear mixed models. Trial registration: ISRCTN56722368. Setting/participants: General practitioners who attended a 2-year Palliative Care Training Course in the Netherlands. Results: Questionnaire data were available for 145 patients (89 in intervention and 56 in control group). We found no significant differences over time between the intervention and control groups in any of the five outcome measures. Ceiling effects were observed for the Rest & Peace Scale, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III and Availability, Current issues and Anticipation Scale. Conclusion: General practitioner participation in the Availability, Current issues and Anticipation training programme did not have a measurable effect on any of the outcomes investigated. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with general practitioner care, regardless of group assignment. Future research might focus on general practitioners without special interest in palliative care.
机译:背景:尽管与接受姑息治疗的患者进行有效沟通可能很困难,但它可能有助于维持或改善患者的生活质量。关于培训全科医生治疗姑息治疗的交流的效果知之甚少。我们假设,接受“可用性,当前问题和预期”交流培训计划的全科医生的姑息治疗患者比对照全科医生的患者报告的结局更好。目的:评估针对患者报告结果的全科医师可用性,当前问题和预期培训计划的有效性。设计:在一项对照试验中,全科医生遵循可用性,当前问题和预期计划,或者属于对照组。接受参与治疗的全科医生的姑息治疗的患者完成了姑息治疗结果量表,欧洲研究和治疗癌症生活质量调查问卷组织第15核心姑息治疗,安宁与和平量表,患者满意度问卷III以及可用性,当前问题和预期量表,在基线和12个月的随访中。我们使用线性混合模型分析了组之间的差异。试用注册:ISRCTN56722368。机构/参与者:在荷兰参加了为期2年的姑息治疗培训课程的全科医生。结果:145例患者的调查问卷数据可用(干预组89例,对照组56例)。我们发现,在五个结果指标中的任何一个方面,干预组和对照组之间随时间的变化都没有显着差异。观察了“休息与和平量表”,“患者满意度调查问卷-III”和“可用性,当前问题和预期量表”的天花板效应。结论:全科医生参与可用性,当前问题和预期培训计划对所调查的任何结果均未产生可衡量的影响。无论小组分配如何,患者均对全科医生护理表示满意。未来的研究可能集中在对姑息治疗没有特别兴趣的全科医生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号