...
首页> 外文期刊>Parkinsonism & related disorders >Heart rate circadian profile in the differential diagnosis between Parkinson disease and multiple system atrophy
【24h】

Heart rate circadian profile in the differential diagnosis between Parkinson disease and multiple system atrophy

机译:帕金森病与多系统萎缩的鉴别诊断中的心律昼夜节律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Clinical diagnostic criteria indicate presence of autonomic features as the primary hallmark of Multiple System Atrophy (MSA). However involvement of the autonomic system is also a recognized feature of Parkinson's Disease (PD), yielding a broad clinical overlap between the two diseases. Laboratory assessments may help in the differential diagnosis between PD and MSA. Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure (AMBP) is a suitable tool to study the circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). Different studies reported a reduction of physiological BP nocturnal dipping in PD and MSA patients, but failed to identify a distinctive pattern discriminating the two diseases. On the other hand, HR nocturnal behavior has not been exhaustively analyzed. In the present study we compared the profiles of HR circadian rhythm in 61 PD and 19MSA patients who underwent 24h AMBP.We found higher nocturnal HR (nHR) (71.5beats/min±7.4) in MSA compared with PD (63.8 beats/min±9.6) as well as significantly lower nocturnal decline of HR (ndHR) in MSA (7.3%±8.2) vs. PD (14%±7.5). At a Receiver Operating Curve analysis nHR and ndHR significantly discriminated MSA from PD. nHR showed a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 62.3% (AUC 0.76; 95% IC 0.65-0.85); ndHR showed a sensitivity of 68% of and a specificity of 77% (AUC 0.72; 95% IC 0.61-0.82).According to our findings, nHR is increased and ndHR is reduced in MSA compared to PD. Moreover, these two indices discriminate between the two diseases with acceptable accuracy.
机译:临床诊断标准表明,自主神经功能的存在是多系统萎缩症(MSA)的主要标志。但是,自主系统的参与也是帕金森氏病(PD)的公认特征,在两种疾病之间产生了广泛的临床重叠。实验室评估可能有助于PD和MSA的鉴别诊断。动态血压监测(AMBP)是研究血压(BP)和心率(HR)的昼夜节律的合适工具。不同的研究报道了PD和MSA患者的生理性BP夜间浸入减少,但未能发现区分这两种疾病的独特模式。另一方面,尚未对HR的夜间行为进行详尽的分析。在本研究中,我们比较了61名接受24h AMBP的PD和19MSA患者的HR昼夜节律特征,发现MSA的夜间HR(nHR)(71.5beats / min±7.4)高于PD(63.8beats / min±) 9.6),以及MSA(7.3%±8.2)相对于PD(14%±7.5)的夜间HR下降(ndHR)。在接收器工作曲线分析中,nHR和ndHR明显区分了MSA和PD。 nHR的敏感性为84.2%,特异性为62.3%(AUC 0.76; 95%IC 0.65-0.85); ndHR的敏感性为68%,特异性为77%(AUC 0.72; 95%IC 0.61-0.82)。根据我们的发现,与PD相比,MSA中nHR升高而ndHR降低。而且,这两个指数以可接受的准确度区分了两种疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号