首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >The Results of Percutaneous Intradiscal High-Pressure Injection of Saline in Patients with Extruded Lumbar Herniated Disc: Comparison with Microendoscopic Discectomy
【24h】

The Results of Percutaneous Intradiscal High-Pressure Injection of Saline in Patients with Extruded Lumbar Herniated Disc: Comparison with Microendoscopic Discectomy

机译:腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮经皮高压输注盐水的结果:与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives. Intradiscal high-pressure injection of saline (IDHP) is a noninvasive procedure for a lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion and an alternative treatment to surgery, such as microendoscopic discectomy (MED). The purpose of this study was to compare the representative outcomes of IDHP with MED in terms of pain relief, reduction of disability, and risk of complications. Methods. Forty-five patients with primarily radicular pain due to an extrusion type disc herniation who underwent either IDHP (N=24) or MED (N=21) were enrolled in the study. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for the treatment of low-back disorders were assessed at pretreatment, 2 weeks posttreatment, and JOA was again taken 3 months posttreatment. Patients were asked to choose their satisfaction from four alternatives, "excellent,""good,""fair," and "poor," 3 months after treatment. Results. Mean VAS decreased from 65.1 to 18.8mm in the IDHP group, and from 80.6 to 16.5 in the MED group. Mean JOA recovery rates at 3 months posttreatment were 67.2 and 75.2, and patients with "excellent" or "good" results were 73.7% and 78.6% in the IDHP and in MED, respectively. Conclusions. IDHP produced significant effects on patients with radicular pain, leading to the improvement of VAS and JOA. Although IDHP displayed slightly less efficacy than MED, IDHP appears to be an alternative as a nonoperative treatment for a lumbar intervertebral disc extrusion.
机译:目标。椎间盘高压注射盐水(IDHP)是腰椎间盘突出术的一种非侵入性方法,也是外科手术的替代疗法,例如微内镜椎间盘切除术(MED)。这项研究的目的是比较IDHP和MED在缓解疼痛,减少残疾和并发症风险方面的代表性结局。方法。该研究纳入了IDHP(N = 24)或MED(N = 21)导致的因挤压型椎间盘突出症引起的主要神经根疼痛的四十五名患者。在治疗前,治疗后2周评估视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分系统,治疗后2周,并在治疗后3个月再次进行JOA。在治疗后3个月,要求患者从四种选择中选择他们的满意程度:“优秀”,“好”,“一般”和“差”。结果。 IDHP组的平均VAS从65.1降至18.8mm,而MED组的从80.6降至16.5mm。治疗后3个月的平均JOA恢复率分别为67.2和75.2,IDHP和MED分别为“优秀”或“良好”的患者分别为73.7%和78.6%。结论。 IDHP对患有神经根痛的患者产生了明显的影响,从而改善了VAS和JOA。尽管IDHP的疗效略低于MED,但IDHP似乎可以作为腰椎间盘突出症的非手术治疗替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号