首页> 外文期刊>Pain medicine : >Regional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: Does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs? Results of a single-centered study
【24h】

Regional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: Does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs? Results of a single-centered study

机译:与老年患者髋部骨折手术中的全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉:是否可以降低发病率,死亡率和医疗费用?单中心研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction. Hip fracture in geriatric patients has a substantial economic impact and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. At our institution, a regional anesthesia program was instituted for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. This retrospective cohort review examines the effects of regional anesthesia (from mainly after July 2007) vs general anesthesia (mainly prior to July 2007) on morbidity, mortality and hospitalization costs. Methods. This retrospective cohort study involved data collection from electronic and paper charts of 308 patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from September 2006 to December 2008. Data on postoperative morbidity, in-patient mortality, and cost of hospitalization (as estimated from data on hospital charges) were collected and analyzed. Seventy-three patients received regional anesthesia and 235 patients received general anesthesia. During July 2007, approximately halfway through the study period, a regional anesthesia and analgesia program was introduced. Results. The average cost of hospitalization in patients who received surgery for hip fracture was no different between patients who receive regional or general anesthesia ($16,789+631 vs $16,815+643, respectively, P=0.9557). Delay in surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) admission resulted in significantly higher hospitalization costs. Age, male gender, African American race and ICU admission were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality and rates of readmission are not statistically different between the two anesthesia groups. Conclusions. There is no difference in postoperative morbidity, rates of rehospitalization, in-patient mortality or hospitalization costs in geriatric patients undergoing regional or general anesthesia for repair of hip fracture. Delay in surgery beyond 3 days and ICU admission both increase cost of hospitalization. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:介绍。老年患者的髋部骨折具有重大的经济影响,是该人群发病和死亡的主要原因。在我们的机构中​​,针对接受髋部骨折手术的患者制定了区域麻醉计划。这项回顾性队列研究回顾了区域麻醉(主要在2007年7月之后)与全身麻醉(主要在2007年7月之前)相对于发病率,死亡率和住院费用的影响。方法。这项回顾性队列研究包括从2006年9月至2008年12月接受手术治疗的308例髋部骨折患者的电子纸质图表中收集的数据。有关术后发病率,住院死亡率和住院费用的数据(根据医院收费数据估算) )进行收集和分析。 73例接受了区域麻醉,235例接受了全身麻醉。在2007年7月,大约是研究期间的一半,引入了区域麻醉和镇痛方案。结果。接受区域或全身麻醉的患者接受髋部骨折手术的患者的平均住院费用没有差异(分别为$ 16,789 + 631和$ 16,815 + 643,P = 0.9557)。手术和重症监护病房(ICU)入院时间的延迟导致住院费用大大增加。年龄,男性,非裔美国人种族和入住ICU与住院死亡率增加相关。两个麻醉组之间的院内死亡率和再入院率无统计学差异。结论。接受区域或全身麻醉修复髋部骨折的老年患者的术后发病率,再住院率,住院死亡率或住院费用无差异。手术延迟超过3天和入ICU都增加了住院费用。威利期刊有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号