首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >The effectiveness of a work style intervention and a lifestyle physical activity intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers.
【24h】

The effectiveness of a work style intervention and a lifestyle physical activity intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers.

机译:工作方式干预和生活方式的体育锻炼干预对计算机工作者的颈部和上肢症状恢复的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study assessed the effectiveness of a single intervention targeting work style and a combined intervention targeting work style and physical activity on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms. Computer workers with frequent or long-term neck and upper limb symptoms were randomised into the work style group (WS, n=152), work style and physical activity group (WSPA, n=156), or usual care group (n=158). The WS and WSPA group attended six group meetings. All meetings focused on behavioural change with regard to body posture, workplace adjustment, breaks and coping with high work demands (WS and WSPA group) and physical activity (WSPA group). Pain, disability at work, days with symptoms and months without symptoms were measured at baseline and after 6 (T1) and 12 months (T2). Self-reported recovery was assessed at T1/T2. Both interventions were ineffective in improving recovery. The work style intervention but not the combined intervention was effective in reducing all pain measures. These effects were present in the neck/shoulder, not in the arm/wrist/hand. For the neck/shoulder, the work style intervention group also showed an increased recovery-rate. Total physical activity increased in all study groups but no differences between groups were observed. To conclude, a group-based work style intervention focused on behavioural change was effective in improving recovery from neck/shoulder symptoms and reducing pain on the long-term. The combined intervention was ineffective in increasing total physical activity. Therefore we cannot draw conclusions on the effect of increasing physical activity on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms.
机译:这项研究评估了针对工作方式的单一干预措施以及针对工作方式和身体活动的综合干预措施对颈部和上肢症状恢复的有效性。经常或长期出现颈部和上肢症状的计算机工作者被随机分为工作方式组(WS,n = 152),工作方式和身体活动组(WSPA,n = 156)或常规护理组(n = 158)。 )。 WS和WSPA小组参加了六次小组会议。所有会议均侧重于身体姿势,工作场所调整,休息和应对高工作要求(WS和WSPA组)和身体活动(WSPA组)方面的行为改变。在基线和第6天(T1)和第12个月(T2)之后,测量疼痛,工作中的残疾,有症状的天数和无症状的月数。在T1 / T2评估自我报告的恢复。两种干预措施均不能有效改善康复。工作方式的干预对减少所有疼痛的措施有效,但对联合干预无效。这些影响存在于颈部/肩膀,而不是手臂/腕部/手。对于脖子/肩膀,工作方式干预小组也显示出提高的恢复率。所有研究组的总体育活动均增加,但各组之间未观察到差异。总之,基于行为改变的基于小组的工作方式干预可以有效地改善颈部/肩膀症状的康复并长期减轻疼痛。联合干预对增加整体体育活动无效。因此,我们无法就增加体育锻炼对颈部和上肢症状恢复的影响得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号