首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety.
【24h】

Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety.

机译:慢性非癌性疼痛中的阿片类药物:疗效和安全性的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Opioids are used increasingly for chronic non-cancer pain. Controversy exists about their effectiveness and safety with long-term use. We analysed available randomised, placebo-controlled trials of WHO step 3 opioids for efficacy and safety in chronic non-cancer pain. The Oxford Pain Relief Database (1950-1994) and Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched until September 2003. Inclusion criteria were randomised comparisons of WHO step 3 opioids with placebo in chronic non-cancer pain. Double-blind studies reporting on pain intensity outcomes using validated pain scales were included. Fifteen randomised placebo-controlled trials were included. Four investigations with 120 patients studied intravenous opioid testing. Eleven studies (1025 patients) compared oral opioids with placebo for four days to eight weeks. Six of the 15 included trials had an open label follow-up of 6-24 months. The mean decrease in pain intensity in most studies was at least 30% with opioids and was comparable in neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain. About 80% of patients experienced at least one adverse event, with constipation (41%), nausea (32%) and somnolence (29%) being most common. Only 44% of 388 patients on open label treatments were still on opioids after therapy for between 7 and 24 months. The short-term efficacy of opioids was good in both neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. However, only a minority of patients in these studies went on to long-term management with opioids. The small number of selected patients and the short follow-ups do not allow conclusions concerning problems such as tolerance and addiction.
机译:阿片类药物越来越多地用于慢性非癌性疼痛。长期使用它们的有效性和安全性存在争议。我们分析了世卫组织第3步阿片类药物在慢性非癌性疼痛中的有效性和安全性的随机,安慰剂对照试验。一直搜索到2003年9月,直到牛津止痛数据库(1950-1994)以及Medline,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。纳入标准是WHO慢性阿片类药物与安慰剂在慢性非癌性疼痛中的随机比较。包括使用经过验证的疼痛量表报告疼痛强度结果的双盲研究。包括十五项随机安慰剂对照试验。对120名患者的四项调查研究了静脉阿片类药物的检测。十一项研究(1025名患者)将口服阿片类药物与安慰剂进行了四天至八周的比较。 15项纳入试验中的6项进行了6-24个月的公开随访。在大多数研究中,阿片类药物的平均疼痛强度降低至少为30%,在神经性和肌肉骨骼疼痛中可比。大约80%的患者经历了至少一种不良事件,其中最常见的是便秘(41%),恶心(32%)和嗜睡(29%)。在接受开放标签治疗的388位患者中,只有44%的患者在治疗7到24个月后仍服用阿片类药物。阿片类药物的短期疗效在神经性和肌肉骨骼疼痛情况下均良好。但是,在这些研究中,只有少数患者接受了阿片类药物的长期治疗。入选患者人数少,随访时间短,因此无法得出有关耐受性和成瘾性等问题的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号