Differential effects of spinal CNQX on two populations of dorsal horn neurons responding to colorectal distension in the rat.

摘要

The present study examined the effect of a spinally administered excitatory amino acid antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; 1, 2.5, 5 microg) on responses of spinal dorsal horn neurons to graded intensities (20, 40, 60, 80 mmHg) of colorectal distention (CRD). Extracellular single unit recordings were made from 28 dorsal horn neurons in the L6-S2 spinal cord. Neurons excited by CRD were subclassified as short latency abrupt (SLA) neurons and short latency sustained (SLS) neurons. The response to graded intensities of CRD was dose-dependently attenuated in 9/17 SLA neurons (53%). The response to CRD was also dose-dependently attenuated in 8/11 SLS neurons (73%). The response to CRD in the remaining eight SLA neurons and three SLS neurons was not attenuated by CNQX. Comparing only neurons that were significantly attenuated by the CNQX, it was found that the magnitude of attenuation of the response to noxious CRD (80 mmHg) produced by 5 microg CNQX was significantly greater in SLA (63 +/-6%) vs. SLS (40 +/- 6%) neurons. While CNQX produced a significant attenuation of the response to innocuous CRD (20 mmHg), there was no difference between the SLA and SLS neurons. The effects of CNQX on the response to somatic stimulation (touch, pinch) of the cutaneous receptive field of these 28 neurons were qualitatively examined in all neurons and quantitatively examined in nine neurons (five SLA and four SLS neurons). CNQX generally decreased the response to pinch or touch, even if CNQX did not attenuate the response to CRD. These results suggest that subpopulations of SLA and SLS neurons are differentially modulated by non-NMDA ionotropic excitatory amino acid receptors and that these neuronal subtypes contribute differently to visceral sensory processing. Furthermore, the lack of correlation between the effects of CNQX on visceral and somatic sensory processing in the same neuron underscores potential differences in processing of visceral and somatic pain.