...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain.
【24h】

Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain.

机译:应答者定义对丰富入组的随机退出试验设计的影响,以建立神经性疼痛的概念证明。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study was to evaluate how enrichment for responders increases assay sensitivity in an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) proof-of-concept (POC) study in neuropathic pain. Adults with moderate to severe peripheral neuropathic pain entered a 3- to 4-day screening period, followed by a 12-day titration to the highest tolerated dose that provided pain control (pregabalin 50-200mg t.i.d.), and then a 9-day maintenance period. Subjects were stratified as primary responders (30%), secondary responders (10% to <30%), or nonresponders (<10%) based on decrease in pain intensity and were randomized to placebo or pregabalin during the randomized withdrawal period. The primary endpoint was mean of average 24-h pain intensity during the last 3days of treatment period relative to the 3days before randomization. Time-to-efficacy-failure was the key secondary endpoint. Other features included not requiring discontinuation of current analgesic therapies and blinding investigators to study design elements that could contribute to non-treatment-related responses. Effect size (ES) (mean treatment difference/SD) was used to measure assay sensitivity. Pregabalin-treated subjects (n=52) had significantly less pain than those receiving placebo (n=51) (P.003). Effect size of the primary endpoint was 0.72 for primary responders and decreased if secondary and nonresponders were included in the analysis. The highest ES (1.68) was demonstrated for the endpoint time-to-efficacy-failure seen in primary responders with painful diabetic neuropathy. The EERW trial design using time-to-efficacy-failure may provide a sensitive and efficient method to conduct POC studies of novel therapies in patients with neuropathic pain. Enriching a study population with patients who have achieved a 30% decrease in pain with an investigational therapy, and using time-to-efficacy-failure during the randomized withdrawal phase as the primary endpoint, can be used for a proof-of-concept study to optimize assay sensitivity and efficiently determine the analgesic potential of a new treatment for neuropathic pain.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估在神经性疼痛中进行的一项丰富的随机入组退出(EERW)概念验证(POC)研究中,针对应答者的浓缩如何提高测定灵敏度。患有中度至重度周围神经性疼痛的成年人进入3至4天的筛查期,然后滴定12天以达到可控制疼痛的最高耐受剂量(普瑞巴林剂量为50至200毫克tid),然后维持9天期。根据疼痛强度的降低,将受试者分为主要反应者(30%),次要反应者(10%至<30%)或无反应者(<10%),并在随机停药期间随机分配至安慰剂或普瑞巴林。主要终点是治疗期最后3天相对于随机分配前3天的平均24小时疼痛强度的平均值。失效时间是关键的次要终点。其他功能包括不需要终止当前的止痛药,并且使研究者不知情,以研究可能导致非治疗相关反应的设计要素。效应大小(ES)(平均治疗差异/ SD)用于测定分析灵敏度。接受普瑞巴林治疗的受试者(n = 52)比接受安慰剂的受试者(n = 51)疼痛明显减轻(P.003)。对于主要反应者,主要终点的影响大小为0.72,如果在分析中包括次要和无反应者,则影响大小减小。在患有糖尿病性神经病的原发性反应者中,观察到达到终点的功效失效时间证明了最高的ES(1.68)。使用有效时间失效的EERW试验设计可能提供一种灵敏有效的方法,对神经性疼痛患者进行新颖疗法的POC研究。通过研究性疗法使研究人群的疼痛减轻了30%,并在随机停药期将疗效失效时间作为主要终点,可用于概念验证研究以优化测定的灵敏度并有效确定神经性疼痛新疗法的镇痛潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号