首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Efficacy and safety of topical diclofenac containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) compared with those of topical placebo, DMSO vehicle and oral diclofenac for knee osteoarthritis.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of topical diclofenac containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) compared with those of topical placebo, DMSO vehicle and oral diclofenac for knee osteoarthritis.

机译:与局部安慰剂,DMSO载体和口服双氯芬酸相比,含二甲亚砜(DMSO)的局部双氯芬酸治疗膝部骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered safe, their long-term efficacy for osteoarthritis has been suspect. We conducted a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial of topical diclofenac (TDiclo) in a vehicle solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in 775 subjects with radiologically confirmed, symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the knee. This 5-arm study compared TDiclo with a placebo solution, the DMSO vehicle, oral diclofenac (ODiclo) and the combination of TDiclo+ODiclo for relieving the signs and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Subjects applied study solution, 40 drops four times daily, and took one study tablet daily for 12 weeks. Co-primary efficacy variables were WOMAC pain and physical function and a patient overall health assessment. Secondary variables were WOMAC stiffness and patient global assessment (PGA) of the knee osteoarthritis. TDiclo was superior to placebo for pain (-6.0 vs. -4.7, P=0.015), physical function (-15.8 vs. -12.3, P=0.034), overall health (-0.95 vs. -0.37, P<0.0001), and PGA (-1.36 vs. -1.01, P=0.016), and was superior to DMSO vehicle for all efficacy variables. No significant difference was observed between DMSO vehicle and placebo or between TDiclo and ODiclo. The commonest adverse event associated with TDiclo was dry skin (18.2%). Fewer digestive system and laboratory abnormalities were observed with TDiclo than with ODiclo. Addition of TDiclo to ODiclo did not increase the incidence of systemic adverse events. TDiclo in DMSO vehicle is an effective treatment option for knee osteoarthritis with efficacy similar to, but tolerability better than ODiclo. DMSO vehicle was no more efficacious than placebo.
机译:虽然局部非甾体类抗炎药被认为是安全的,但怀疑它们对骨关节炎的长期疗效。我们在775名经放射学证实为有症状的膝关节原发性骨关节炎患者中进行了为期12周,双盲,双盲,局部双氯芬酸(TDiclo)在含二甲亚砜(DMSO)的载剂溶液中的随机对照试验。这项5项研究比较了TDiclo与安慰剂溶液,DMSO载体,口服双氯芬酸(ODiclo)以及TDiclo + ODiclo的组合,以缓解膝盖骨关节炎的体征和症状。受试者使用研究溶液,每天40次,每次四滴,每天服用一粒研究片剂,持续12周。共同主要疗效变量是WOMAC疼痛和身体功能以及患者总体健康评估。次要变量是WOMAC僵硬度和膝骨关节炎的患者总体评估(PGA)。 TDiclo在疼痛(-6.0 vs. -4.7,P = 0.015),身体功能(-15.8 vs -12.3,P = 0.034),整体健康状况(-0.95 vs.-0.37,P <0.0001)方面优于安慰剂,和PGA(-1.36对-1.01,P = 0.016),并且在所有功效变量上均优于DMSO载体。在DMSO载体和安慰剂之间或TDiclo和ODiclo之间未观察到显着差异。与TDiclo相关的最常见不良事件是皮肤干燥(18.2%)。用TDiclo观察到的消化系统和实验室异常少于ODiclo。在ODiclo中添加TDiclo不会增加全身不良事件的发生率。 DMSO载体中的TDiclo是一种有效的治疗膝骨关节炎的方法,其疗效与ODiclo相似,但耐受性更好。 DMSO载体没有安慰剂有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号