...
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Biology >Rarity and Incomplete Sampling in DNA-Based Species Delimitation
【24h】

Rarity and Incomplete Sampling in DNA-Based Species Delimitation

机译:基于DNA的物种定界中的稀有性和不完全采样

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

DNA-based species delimitation may be compromised by limited sampling effort and species rarity, including "singleton" representatives of species, which hampers estimates of intra-versus interspecies evolutionary processes. In a case study of southern African chafers (beetles in the family Scarabaeidae), many species and subclades were poorly represented and 48.5% of species were singletons. Using cox1 sequences from > 500 specimens and similar to 100 species, the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) analysis as well as various other approaches for DNA-based species delimitation (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), Poisson tree processes (PTP), Species Identifier, Statistical Parsimony), frequently produced poor results if analyzing a narrow target group only, but the performance improved when several subclades were combined. Hence, low sampling may be compensated for by "clade addition" of lineages outside of the focal group. Similar findings were obtained in reanalysis of published data sets of taxonomically poorly known species assemblages of insects from Madagascar. The low performance of undersampled trees is not due to high proportions of singletons per se, as shown in simulations (with 13%, 40% and 52% singletons). However, the GMYC method was highly sensitive to variable effective population size (Ne), which was exacerbated by variable species abundances in the simulations. Hence, low sampling success and rarity of species affect the power of the GMYC method only if they reflect great differences in N-e among species. Potential negative effects of skewed species abundances and prevalence of singletons are ultimately an issue about the variation in Ne and the degree to which this is correlated with the census population size and sampling success. Clade addition beyond a limited study group can overcome poor sampling for the GMYC method in particular under variable Ne. This effect was less pronounced for methods of species delimitation not based on coalescent models.
机译:基于DNA的物种划分可能会受到有限的采样工作和物种稀缺性的影响,其中包括物种的“单个”代表,这阻碍了对物种间物种间进化过程的估计。在对南部非洲金龟子(甲虫科中的甲虫)的案例研究中,许多物种和子代的代表性很差,并且48.5%的物种为单身。使用来自500多个标本且与100种相似的cox1序列,进行了通用混合Yule合并(GMYC)分析以及其他各种基于DNA的物种定界方法(自动条形码差距发现(ABGD),泊松树过程(PTP),如果仅分析一个狭窄的目标群体,物种识别符(统计简约)通常会产生较差的结果,但是当合并多个子小节时,性能会提高。因此,低采样可以通过焦点组外部的谱系的“包层添加”来补偿。在对马达加斯加昆虫分类学上鲜为人知的物种组合的已发布数据集的重新分析中获得了类似的发现。如模拟所示(单例分别为13%,40%和52%),欠采样树的低性能并不是由于单例本身的比例很高。但是,GMYC方法对可变有效种群大小(Ne)高度敏感,在模拟中,可变物种的丰富度加剧了这一问题。因此,只有当物种的N-e差异很大时,物种的低采样成功率和稀有性才会影响GMYC方法的功能。偏态物种丰度和单身人群患病率的潜在负面影响最终是有关Ne变化以及与普查人口规模和抽样成功率相关程度的问题。在有限的研究小组之外增加族群可以克服GMYC方法的不良采样,尤其是在变量Ne下。对于不基于合并模型的物种划界方法,这种影响不太明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号