首页> 外文期刊>Sleep and biological rhythms. >Sleep evaluation by a newly developed PVDF sensor non-contact sheet: a comparison with standard polysomnography and wrist actigraphy
【24h】

Sleep evaluation by a newly developed PVDF sensor non-contact sheet: a comparison with standard polysomnography and wrist actigraphy

机译:通过新开发的PVDF传感器非接触片进行睡眠评估:与标准多导睡眠监测仪和腕部手法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Polysomnographic (PSG) recording of multiple physiological measures remains the gold standard for sleep assessment in both basic and clinical human sleep research. However, PSG requires many unnatural conditions that can influence sleep phenomena. Recently, non-contact sheet sensors (SS) have been developed for sleep evaluation. Sheet sensor technology provides advantages over existing minimally intrusive devices used to analyze sleep-related behavior, such as wrist actigraphy (WA), beginning with freedom from attachment to any probes or devices. Current SS measures additionally include two physiological measures - heart rate (HR) and respiration rate (RR). To test the validity of SS analyses, we performed simultaneous recordings of SS and standard PSG in thirteen healthy adult sleepers, with WA additionally available for nine of the subjects. Sleep period features were compared among the three methods, and HR and RR data from SS and PSG were compared. Comparisons between the automatic scoring of SS and WA and visual PSG scoring showed good sleep-wake discrimination (88.3% and 89.4% respectively). Sleep onset estimation relative to PSG was also good for both SS and WA (0.38 and -2.44 epoch differences, respectively). In addition, HR and RR measured by SS were also compared with PSG. Both HR and RR closely approximated PSG physiological measures (error rates: HR 2.4%, RR 4.3%). In summary, SS is expected to be less disruptive and easier to use for long-term home sleep monitoring.
机译:多项生理测量的多导睡眠图(PSG)记录仍然是基本和临床人类睡眠研究中睡眠评估的金标准。但是,PSG需要许多可能影响睡眠现象的非自然条件。近来,已经开发了非接触式薄片传感器(SS)用于睡眠评估。薄板传感器技术相对于现有的用于分析与睡眠有关的行为的最小侵入性设备(例如腕部触觉仪(WA)),具有优势,而无需附加任何探头或设备。当前的SS测量还包括两种生理测量-心率(HR)和呼吸率(RR)。为了测试SS分析的有效性,我们在13个健康的成人睡眠者中同时记录了SS和标准PSG,其中9个受试者还可以使用WA。比较了三种方法的睡眠时间特征,并比较了来自SS和PSG的HR和RR数据。 SS和WA的自动评分与PSG视觉评分之间的比较显示出良好的觉醒辨别力(分别为88.3%和89.4%)。 SS和WA的睡眠发作相对于PSG的估计也都很好(分别为0.38和-2.44历时差异)。此外,还将SS测量的HR和RR与PSG进行了比较。 HR和RR都非常接近PSG生理指标(错误率:HR 2.4%,RR 4.3%)。总而言之,预计SS的破坏性较小,并且更易于用于长期家庭睡眠监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号