首页> 外文期刊>Sleep & breathing =: Schlaf & Atmung >Nasal versus oronasal continuous positive airway pressure masks for obstructive sleep apnea: Is this really a key point of effectiveness?
【24h】

Nasal versus oronasal continuous positive airway pressure masks for obstructive sleep apnea: Is this really a key point of effectiveness?

机译:鼻与口鼻连续气道正压面罩治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:这真的是疗效的关键点吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bakker et al. analyzed that changing from a nasal to oronasal mask increased leak and residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) without an influence on the therapeutic pressure requirement in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) [1]. The findings of the current study highlight mask leak as the major difficulty in the use of oronasal masks.We read with interest this study that revealed if there is a variation in pressure levels in patients with OSA by changing the type of facial nasal interface. The authors in this study provide original observations with important implications for the effectiveness of treating patients with OSA and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) [1]. However, there are some aspects that may be of interest to perform an analysis, especially those related to the possible pathways of controlling these changes in pressure and residual leak levels.
机译:Bakker等。分析认为,从鼻罩改为口鼻罩会增加渗漏和残余呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI),而不会影响肥胖阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的治疗压力需求[1]。当前研究的结果突出了口罩泄漏是使用口鼻罩的主要困难。我们感兴趣地阅读了这项研究,该研究揭示了OSA患者通过改变面部鼻界面的类型是否存在压力水平的变化。本研究的作者提供了原始观察结果,对OSA和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)患者的治疗效果具有重要意义[1]。但是,某些方面可能对执行分析很有兴趣,尤其是那些与控制压力和残余泄漏水平的这些变化的可能途径有关的方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号