...
首页> 外文期刊>Sleep >Comparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF study.
【24h】

Comparison of sleep parameters from actigraphy and polysomnography in older women: the SOF study.

机译:来自老年妇女的体动描记法和多导睡眠图睡眠指标的比较:SOF研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) as assessed by actigraphy gathered in 3 different modes were compared to polysomnography (PSG) measurements. Each mode was compared to PSG to determine which was more accurate. Associations of the difference in TST measurement with demographics and sleep characteristics were examined. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Community-based. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight women (mean age 81.9 years) from the latest visit of the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures who were concurrently measured with PSG and actigraphy. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In-home 12-channel PSG was gathered along with actigraphy data in 3 modes: proportional integration mode (PIM), time above threshold (TAT) and zero crossings mode (ZCM). The PIM mode corresponded better to PSG, with a mean overestimation of TST of 17.9 min. For the PIM mode, the estimation of TST and SE by PSG and actigraphy significantly differed (P < 0.01), while the estimation of WASO was similar (P = 0.27). The intraclass correlation between the 2 procedures was moderate to high (PIM mode: TST 0.76; SE 0.61; WASO 0.58). On average, the PIM mode underestimated TST by 68 min for those who slept < or = 5 hr, overestimated TST by 31 min for those with SE < 70%, and underestimated TST by 24 min for self-reported poor sleepers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep parameters from actigraphy corresponded reasonably well to PSG in this population, with the PIM mode of actigraphy correlating highest. Those with poor sleep quality had the largest measurement error between the 2 procedures.
机译:研究目的:将通过三种不同模式下的体动记录仪评估的总睡眠时间(TST),睡眠效率(SE)和入睡后唤醒(WASO)与多导睡眠图(PSG)测量进行比较。将每种模式与PSG进行比较,以确定哪种模式更准确。研究了TST测量差异与人口统计学和睡眠特征之间的关系。设计:观察性研究。地点:基于社区。参加者:最近接受骨质疏松性骨折研究的68名妇女(平均年龄81.9岁),他们同时接受了PSG和肌动描记法测量。干预措施:N / A。测量和结果:家用12通道PSG随书画数据以3种模式收集:比例积分模式(PIM),阈值以上时间(TAT)和过零模式(ZCM)。 PIM模式与PSG更好地对应,TST的平均高估为17.9分钟。对于PIM模式,通过PSG和书画对TST和SE的估计存在显着差异(P <0.01),而WASO的估计则相似(P = 0.27)。两种程序之间的组内相关性为中等到较高(PIM模式:TST 0.76; SE 0.61; WASO 0.58)。平均而言,PIM模式将睡眠时间小于或等于5小时的患者的TST低估了68分钟,对于SE <70%的睡眠者的PST模式低估了TST 31分钟,对于自我报告的不良睡眠者,PIM模式低估了TST 24分钟(P <0.05) )。结论:在该人群中,笔法的睡眠参数与PSG相当吻合,PIM方式的笔法相关性最高。睡眠质量较差的人在两次检查之间的测量误差最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号