首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility predicts subsequent ICD activation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients: a DEFINITE substudy.
【24h】

Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility predicts subsequent ICD activation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients: a DEFINITE substudy.

机译:室性心律失常的可诱导性可预测非缺血性心肌病患者随后的ICD激活:DEFINITE子研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether electrophysiologic (EP) inducibility predicts the subsequent occurrence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial. BACKGROUND: Inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias has been widely used as a risk marker to select implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) candidates, but is believed not to be predictive in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. METHODS: In DEFINITE, patients randomized to the ICD arm, but not the conventional arm, underwent noninvasive EP testing via the ICD shortly after ICD implantation using up to three extrastimuli at three cycle lengths plus burst pacing. Inducibility was defined as monomorphic or polymorphic VT or VF lasting 15 seconds. Patients were followed for a median of 29 +/- 14 months (interquartile range = 2-41). An independent committee, blinded to inducibility status, characterized the rhythm triggering ICD shocks. RESULTS: Inducibility, found in 29 of 204 patients (VT in 13, VF in 16), was associated with diabetes (41.4% vs 20.6%, P = 0.014) and a slightly higher ejection fraction (23.2 +/- 5.9 vs 20.5 +/- 5.7, P = 0.021). In follow-up, 34.5% of the inducible group (10 of 29) experienced ICD therapy for VT or VF or arrhythmic death versus 12.0% (21 of 175) noninducible patients (hazard ratio = 2.60, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In DEFINITE patients, inducibility of either VT or VF was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent ICD therapy for VT or VF, and should be one factor considered in risk stratifying nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients.
机译:目的:在非缺血性心肌病治疗评估(DEFINITE)试验中,我们评估了电生理(EP)的可诱导性是否预测了除颤器中自发性室性心动过速(VT)或室性纤颤(VF)的发生。背景:室性心律失常的可诱导性已被广泛用作选择植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)候选药物的风险标志物,但据信在非缺血性心肌病患者中并非可预测的。方法:在DEFINITE中,随机分配到ICD臂而非常规臂的患者在ICD植入后不久通过ICD进行无创性EP测试,使用三个周期长度的最多三个额外刺激加突发起搏。诱导性定义为持续15秒的单态或多态VT或VF。随访患者的中位数为29 +/- 14个月(四分位间距= 2-41)。一个对诱导状态不知情的独立委员会对触发ICD休克的节奏进行了描述。结果:在204例患者中有29例(VT在13例中,VF在16例中)被发现与糖尿病相关(41.4%vs 20.6%,P = 0.014)和射血分数略高(23.2 +/- 5.9 vs 20.5 +)。 /-5.7,P=0.021)。在随访中,34.5%的可诱导组(29名患者中的10名)经历了VT或VF或心律失常性死亡的ICD治疗,而12.0%(175名患者中的21名)不可诱导患者经历了ICD治疗(危险比= 2.60,P = 0.014)。结论:在明确的患者中,VT或VF的可诱导性与随后对VT或VF进行ICD治疗的可能性增加有关,应将其作为对非缺血性心肌病患者进行风险分层的考虑因素之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号