...
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Relative and Absolute Benefits: Main Results Should be Reported in Absolute Terms.
【24h】

Relative and Absolute Benefits: Main Results Should be Reported in Absolute Terms.

机译:相对利益和绝对利益:主要结果应以绝对条款报告。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Conventions change in scientific writing. Many years ago, it was usual to report clinical data as mean ?SEM (standard error of the mean). This produced impressively small "error bars" in graphic representations, but were often misleading, especially when dealing with small sample sizes. Most journals therefore urged a change to standard deviation (?SD), which has almost entirely replaced SEM in clinical reports. In the arrhythmia field, early implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) papers reported "hypothetical" deaths and "hypothetical arrhythmic deaths" based on the assumption that an ICD shock could be equated with a life saved.1 These terms fail to withstand scrutiny. A NASPE (HRS) position paper2 called for primary endpoints to be reported as total mortality ("dead or alive"), and this is now standard practice.
机译:惯例改变了科学写作。许多年前,通常将临床数据报告为均值?SEM(均值的标准误)。这在图形表示中产生了令人印象深刻的小“误差线”,但通常会产生误导,尤其是在处理小样本量时。因此,大多数期刊都敦促更改标准偏差(?SD),在临床报告中几乎已完全取代了SEM。在心律不齐领域,早期的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)论文基于“ ICD休克等同于挽救生命”这一假设,报道了“假性”死亡和“假性心律不齐死亡”。1这些术语无法经受严格的审查。 NASPE(HRS)立场文件2要求将主要终点报告为总死亡率(“死亡或活着”),这现已成为标准做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号