首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Atrial threshold variability: implications for automatic atrial stimulation algorithms.
【24h】

Atrial threshold variability: implications for automatic atrial stimulation algorithms.

机译:心房阈值变异性:对自动心房刺激算法的启示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background:Automatic management of atrial stimulation by verification of atrial threshold (ACM) has recently been made feasible. We investigated circadian atrial threshold variability over the long term and the predictors of successful automatic atrial threshold measurement, in order to provide practical clues for programming ACM features, in such a way as to achieve daily threshold verification and > 99% effective atrial stimulation. Methods:Six daily attempts to measure atrial threshold were programmed in patients receiving an EnPulsetrade mark pacemaker (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Atrioventricular (AV) conduction was maximized by programming Search AV+ (SAV+) to a resting Paced AV delay = 400 ms in the first month, and 600 ms thereafter. Results:Seventy-six patients had a median follow-up of 12 months. Median ACM success was 77%. Concordance between automatically and manually measured thresholds was observed during the entire follow-up (Rho = 0.82, P < 0.001). Daily variability in atrialthreshold was < 0.5 V in > 94% of measurements in the first trimester after implantation, and < 0.5 V in > 99% of measurements thereafter, as well as any time after pacemaker replacement. Atrial threshold was measured on 86% of days: the predictors of ACM failure were AV block (AVB), high%Atrial pacing, and atrial fibrillation. Programming SAV+ to achieve 600 ms resting Paced AV decreased%Vpacing in patients with normal AV conduction and first-degree AVB, improving the ability to detect atrial threshold. Conclusions:The reliability of ACM is high over a long follow-up. On the basis of atrial threshold variability, a practical approach to ACM programming should be two daily atrial threshold measurements in patients with normal AV conduction and%Ap 40% or with recurrent atrial fibrillation and AVB. The lowest adapted stimulation output should achieve at least threshold +1 V in the first trimester after implantation, then threshold +0.5 V thereafter, in order to achieve > 99.5% effective atrial stimulation.
机译:背景:最近已通过验证心房阈值(ACM)来自动管理心房刺激。我们调查了昼夜节律性心房阈值变异性以及成功进行自动心房阈值测量的预测因素,以便为实现ACM功能编程提供实用的线索,以实现每日阈值验证和> 99%的有效心房刺激。方法:对接受EnPulsetrade商标起搏器(美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市的Medtronic Inc.)的患者进行每天六次测量心房阈值的尝试。通过将Search AV +(SAV +)编程为第一个月的静息起搏AV延迟= 400毫秒,此后为600毫秒,可以最大化房室(AV)传导。结果:76例患者平均随访12个月。 ACM成功率中位数为77%。在整个随访过程中观察到自动阈值和手动测量阈值之间的一致性(Rho = 0.82,P <0.001)。在植入后的头三个月中,心律阈值的日变化在> 94%的测量值中为<0.5 V,在其后以及起搏器更换后的任何时间,其> 99%的测量值为<0.5V。在86%的天中测量房颤阈值:ACM失败的预测因素是房室传导阻滞(AVB),高心房起搏百分比和房颤。对SAV +进行编程以实现600 ms静息起搏的AV可使正常AV传导和一级AVB的患者的%Vpacing降低,从而提高了检测心房阈值的能力。结论:在长期随访中,ACM的可靠性很高。根据心房阈值变异性,ACM编程的一种实用方法是对AV传导正常且%Ap≤= 40%或窦性活动和AVB正常的患者每天进行两次心房阈值测量,而应进行3-4次测量推荐用于一级AVB和%Ap> 40%或复发性房颤和AVB的患者。最低的适应性刺激输出应在植入后的头三个月至少达到阈值+1 V,然后在阈值+0.5 V之后,以实现> 99.5%的有效心房刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号