首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >A prospective randomised evaluation of G-CSF or G-CSF plus oral antibiotics in chemotherapy-treated patients at high risk of developing febrile neutropenia.
【24h】

A prospective randomised evaluation of G-CSF or G-CSF plus oral antibiotics in chemotherapy-treated patients at high risk of developing febrile neutropenia.

机译:前瞻性随机评估G-CSF或G-CSF加口服抗生素治疗高发性中性粒细胞减少症的化疗患者中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major dose-limiting complication among patients treated with chemotherapy. Haematopoietic colony stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) made possible a significant improvement in the management of FN, both in the therapeutic and in the prophylactic approach. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis also permits a definite reduction of severe infections during neutropenia. Nevertheless, the possible role of these two interventions for secondary prevention of FN is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomised trial by comparing the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the association of G-CSF with oral antibiotics in the secondary prevention of FN. We included in our study those patients who, after an episode of FN, continued to be treated with the same chemotherapy without reduction of dose intensity. They were randomised into two groups: the first received G-CSF (group G; filgrastim, 5 microg/kg day), and thesecond was treated with an association of G-CSF and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus ciprofloxacin (group G/ACC). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomised (group G: n=23 and group G/ACC: n=25). There was no recurrence of FN among the patients receiving G-CSF and only one episode in the combined therapy group (p=1). With regard to the side effects, there was no significant difference in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The use of G-CSF for the secondary prevention of FN is extremely effective and allows the maintenance of chemotherapy dose intensity. Our study showed that the addition of antibiotics does not seem to be required.
机译:背景:发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)仍然是化疗患者的主要剂量限制性并发症。造血菌落刺激因子(G-CSF和GM-CSF)使FN的治疗和预防方法有了显着改善。预防性使用抗生素还可以明显减少中性粒细胞减少症期间的严重感染。然而,这两种干预措施对于FN的二级预防的可能作用仍不清楚。患者与方法:我们通过比较粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的疗效以及G-CSF与口服抗生素在FN的二级预防中的关系,进行了一项前瞻性随机试验。我们的研究纳入了FN发作后继续接受相同化疗但未降低剂量强度的那些患者。他们被随机分为两组:第一组接受G-CSF(G组;非格司亭,5微克/千克/天),第二组接受G-CSF和阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐加环丙沙星联合治疗(G / ACC组)。结果:48例患者被随机分组​​(G组:n = 23,G / ACC组:n = 25)。在接受G-CSF的患者中,FN没有复发,在联合治疗组中只有1次发作(p = 1)。关于副作用,两组之间没有显着差异。结论:G-CSF用于FN的二级预防非常有效,可维持化学疗法的剂量强度。我们的研究表明,似乎不需要添加抗生素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号