首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
【24h】

Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

机译:干预措施以改善头颈癌患者心理状况的证据:对文献的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: In addition to cancer-related distress, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) endure facial disfigurement and difficulties with eating and communication. High rates of alcohol use and socio-economic disadvantage raise concerns that patients with HNC may be less likely than others to participate in and adhere to psychological interventions. This article aims to inform future practice and research by reviewing the evidence in support of psychological interventions for this patient group. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in December 2009. Relevant studies were rated for internal and external validity against the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) US Preventive Services Task Force. Wherever possible, outcomes were evaluated using effect sizes to confirm statistically significant results and enable comparison between studies. Meta-analysis was planned according to criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Levels of evidence for each intervention type were evaluated using AHRQ criteria. RESULTS: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. One study was rated 'good' for internal validity and four for external validity. Psycho-education and/or cognitive-behavioural therapy were evaluated by seven studies, and communication skills training and a support group by one study each. Significant heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Based on a study-by-study review, there was most support for psycho-education, with three out of five studies finding at least some effect. CONCLUSIONS: Research to date suggests it is feasible to recruit people with HNC to psychological interventions and to evaluate their progress through repeated-outcome measures. Evidence for interventions is limited by the small number of studies, methodological problems, and poor comparability. Future interventions should target HNC patients who screen positive for clinical distress and be integrated into standard care.
机译:目的:除了与癌症有关的困扰之外,患有头颈癌(HNC)的人还会容忍面部容颜受损以及进食和沟通困难。高饮酒率和社会经济劣势引起了人们的担忧,即与其他人相比,HNC患者参加和坚持心理干预的可能性较小。本文旨在通过审查支持该患者群体心理干预的证据,为未来的实践和研究提供参考。方法:我们于2009年12月对CENTRAL,Medline,Embase,PsycINFO和CINAHL进行了搜索。根据美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)美国预防服务工作队的标准,对相关研究的内部和外部有效性进行了评级。在可能的情况下,使用效应量评估结果,以确认统计学上显着的结果并进行研究之间的比较。根据《 Cochrane系统评价手册》中的标准计划进行荟萃分析。使用AHRQ标准评估每种干预类型的证据水平。结果:九项研究符合纳入标准。一项研究的内部效度为“好”,而外部效度为四项。七项研究评估了心理教育和/或认知行为疗法,而一项研究评估了沟通技能培训和支持小组。显着的异质性排除了荟萃分析的必要。根据逐项研究的回顾,对心理教育的支持最多,五分之三的研究至少有一定效果。结论:迄今为止的研究表明,招募患有HNC的人进行心理干预并通过重复结果措施评估其进展是可行的。干预的证据受到研究数量少,方法学问题和可比性差的限制。未来的干预措施应针对筛查临床病情呈阳性并已纳入标准治疗的HNC患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号