...
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Exploring the perceived changes and the reasons why expected outcomes were not obtained in individual levels in a successful regional palliative care intervention trial: An analysis for interpretations
【24h】

Exploring the perceived changes and the reasons why expected outcomes were not obtained in individual levels in a successful regional palliative care intervention trial: An analysis for interpretations

机译:在成功的区域性姑息治疗干预试验中探讨感知到的变化以及为何未在各个级别获得预期结果的原因:解释分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: The Japan Outreach Palliative Care Trial of Integrated Model (OPTIM) study, a mixed-methods study to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive regional palliative care program, revealed that the program provided broad positive outcomes at the regional level: increased home death, palliative care use, patient- and family-reported qualities of care, and health care professionals' difficulties. Not all participants however obtained positive outcomes and thus exploring the reasons why expected outcomes were observed in individual levels could be of value. Aims: The primary aims were to explore why expected outcomes were not obtained in individual participants, and the perceived changes in daily practices of physicians and nurses were explored. Subjects and methods: Postintervention questionnaire survey on 857 patients, 1,137 bereaved family members, 706 physicians, and 2,236 nurses were analyzed. Results: The reasons for not achieving home deaths included unexpected rapid deterioration, caregivers unavailable, concerns about adequate responses to sudden changes, and physical symptoms uncontrolled, while lack of physician availability at home and lack of information from physicians were less frequently reported. The reasons for not receiving specialized palliative care services were the lack of recommendations from physicians and no information about palliative care services. The reason for evaluating the quality of palliative care as not high was that clinicians tried to relieve symptoms, but there were limited effects and insufficient time. Many physicians and nurses reported that they became more aware of palliative care, that the availability of palliative care specialists and knowledge about palliative care improved, and that they cooperated with other regional health care providers more easily. Conclusion: The OPTIM study seemed to succeed in optimizing physician availability at home, improves physician information about home care, achieved maximum efforts to relieve patient distress by clinicians, and increased communication among regional health care professionals. To achieve further better outcomes, multiple interventions to the health care system to be performed on the basis of a comprehensive regional palliative care program are proposed.
机译:背景:日本综合模式姑息治疗试验研究(OPTIM)是一项评估综合区域姑息治疗计划效果的混合方法研究,显示该计划在区域一级提供了广泛的积极成果:家庭死亡增加,姑息治疗的使用,患者和家庭报告的护理质量以及医护人员的困难。但是,并非所有参与者都获得了积极的成果,因此探讨了在各个层面观察到预期成果可能具有价值的原因。目的:主要目的是探究为何未在个别参与者中获得预期的结果,并探讨了医生和护士日常行为的感知变化。研究对象和方法:对干预后的问卷调查进行了分析,该调查对857例患者,1,137名丧亲家庭成员,706名医生和2,236名护士进行了分析。结果:未能实现家庭死亡的原因包括意料之外的迅速恶化,无法提供护理人员,担心对突然变化的适当反应以及身体症状不受控制,而较少报告家庭缺乏医生和缺乏医生信息的情况。不接受专门的姑息治疗服务的原因是缺乏医生的建议,也没有有关姑息治疗服务的信息。评估姑息治疗质量不高的原因是临床医生试图缓解症状,但效果有限且时间不足。许多医生和护士报告说,他们对姑息治疗有了更多的了解,姑息治疗专家的可获得性和对姑息治疗的了解有所改善,并且他们与其他区域性医疗保健提供者的合作更加轻松。结论:OPTIM研究似乎成功地优化了家庭医生的利用率,改善了医生对家庭护理的信息,为减轻临床医生对患者的困扰做出了最大的努力,并增加了区域医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通。为了进一步取得更好的结果,建议在综合的区域姑息治疗计划的基础上对医疗保健系统进行多种干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号