首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research
【24h】

Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research

机译:癌症患者和临床医生对二级治疗最佳时间的看法,以接近患者作为研究对象,进行纵向问卷调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose A priority of the UK National Cancer Survivorship Initiative is to increase collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) longitudinally post-diagnosis. This study aimed to gather cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions and preferences about the best time, in the secondary care pathway, to approach patients about joining longitudinal observational PROMs-based (LO-PROMs) research. Methods The sample comprised 15 patients with nonmetastatic breast, colorectal or prostate cancer, and 15 clinicians including surgeons, oncologists and nurse specialists. Patients and clinicians participated in one face-to-face topicguided audio-recorded interview. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results Patients did not want to be approached about LOPROMs research early in the care pathway, near diagnosis and treatment planning or before any surgery and its results. Patients felt that LO-PROMs research is best introduced from the time people are 'settled' on (post-surgical) treatment regimens, provided they are coping well emotionally and not experiencing significant physical side effects; patients emphasised variability in people's experience of and response to cancer and treatment. Clinicians also advised against approach near diagnosis, although generally recommended initiating recruitment somewhat sooner than patients. Conclusions Patients expressed strong homogeneous preferences and ideally wanted to be approached about LOPROMs research when their initial fears and anxiety about cancer treatment and survival had diminished, and they felt some sense of certainty and optimismabout the future. As the timeline of clinical events varies, maximising recruitment may mean approaching patients at varied time points post-diagnosis. Further recruitment implications are discussed.
机译:目的英国国家癌症生存计划的一个优先事项是在诊断后纵向增加患者报告的结局指标(PROM)的收集。这项研究旨在收集癌症患者和临床医生对二级护理途径中最佳时间的意见和偏好,以使患者参与基于纵向观察性基于PROMs(LO-PROM)的研究。方法样本包括15例非转移性乳腺癌,结直肠癌或前列腺癌患者,以及15名临床医生,包括外科医生,肿瘤科医生和护士专家。患者和临床医生参加了一次面对面的有主题的录音采访。使用主题内容分析对数据进行分析。结果患者不希望在护理路径的早期,临近诊断和治疗计划时或在任何手术及其结果之前获得有关LOPROMs研究的信息。患者感到LO-PROMs研究最好从人们“适应”(术后)治疗方案的时间开始进行,前提是他们在情感上能应付自如,并且没有明显的身体副作用。患者强调人们对癌症和治疗的经历和反应的差异。尽管通常建议比患者更早开始募集,但临床医生也建议不要在诊断时采用这种方法。结论患者表现出强烈的同质性偏爱,并且理想的情况是,当他们对癌症治疗和生存的最初恐惧和焦虑减轻了,并且对未来有一定的确定性和乐观感时,希望与他们进行LOPROMs研究。随着临床事件时间表的变化,最大程度地招募可能意味着在诊断后的不同时间点接近患者。讨论了进一步的招聘含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号