首页> 外文期刊>Surveys in Geophysics: An International Review Journal of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences >Seasonal Water Storage Variations as Impacted by Water Abstractions:Comparing the Output of a Global Hydrological Model with GRACE and GPS Observations
【24h】

Seasonal Water Storage Variations as Impacted by Water Abstractions:Comparing the Output of a Global Hydrological Model with GRACE and GPS Observations

机译:受取水量影响的季节性储水量变化:将全球水文模型的输出与GRACE和GPS观测进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Better quantification of continental water storage variations is expected to improve our understanding of water flows, including evapotranspiration, runoff and river discharge as well as human water abstractions. For the first time, total water storage (TWS) on the land area of the globe as computed by the global water model WaterGAP (Water Global Assessment and Prognosis) was compared to both gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) and global positioning system (GPS) observations. The GRACE satellites sense the effect of TWS on the dynamic gravity field of the Earth. GPS reference points are displaced due to crustal deformation caused by time-varying TWS. Unfortunately, the worldwide coverage of the GPS tracking network is irregular, while GRACE provides global coverage albeit with low spatial resolution. Detrended TWS time series were analyzed by determining scaling factors for mean annual amplitude (fGRACE) and time series of monthly TWS (fGPS). Both GRACE and GPS indicate that WaterGAP underestimates seasonal variations of TWS on most of the land area of the globe. In addition, seasonal maximum TWS occurs 1 month earlier according to WaterGAP than according to GRACE on most land areas. While WaterGAP TWS is sensitive to the applied climate input data, none of the two data sets result in a clearly better fit to the observations. Due to the low number of GPS sites, GPS observations are less useful for validating global hydrological models than GRACE observations, but they serve to support the validity of GRACE TWS as observational target for hydrological modeling. For unknown reasons, WaterGAP appears to fit better to GPS than to GRACE. Both GPS and GRACE data, however, are rather uncertain due to a number of reasons, in particular in dry regions. It is not possible to benefit from either GPS or GRACE observations to monitor and quantify human water abstractions if only detrended (seasonal) TWS variations are considered. Regarding GRACE, this is mainly caused by the attenuation of the TWS differences between water abstraction variants due to the filtering required for GRACE TWS. Regarding GPS, station density is too low. Only if water abstractions lead to long-term changes in TWS by depletion or restoration of water storage in groundwater or large surface water bodies, GRACE may be used to support the quantification of human water abstractions.
机译:预计对大陆水储量变化进行更好的量化可以提高我们对水流的理解,包括蒸散量,径流和河流流量以及人类的取水量。首次将全球水模型WaterGAP(水全球评估和预后)计算出的全球陆地上的总储水量(TWS)与重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)以及全球定位系统( GPS)观测。 GRACE卫星可以感知TWS对地球动态重力场的影响。 GPS参考点由于随时间变化的TWS引起的地壳变形而发生位移。不幸的是,GPS跟踪网络的全球覆盖范围是不规则的,而GRACE提供的覆盖范围虽然空间分辨率较低。通过确定平均年振幅(fGRACE)和月度TWS时间序列(fGPS)的比例因子来分析去趋势的TWS时间序列。 GRACE和GPS均表明WaterGAP低估了全球大部分陆地上TWS的季节性变化。此外,在大多数陆地地区,根据WaterGAP,季节性最高TWS比GRACE提前1个月。尽管WaterGAP TWS对应用的气候输入数据很敏感,但是这两个数据集均无法明显更好地拟合观测结果。由于GPS站点数量少,因此GPS观测比GRACE观测对验证全球水文模型的用处不大,但它们可用来支持GRACE TWS作为水文建模观测目标的有效性。由于未知原因,WaterGAP似乎更适合GPS而不是GRACE。然而,由于多种原因,尤其是在干旱地区,GPS和GRACE数据都不确定。如果仅考虑趋势(季节性)TWS变化,则无法从GPS或GRACE观测中受益来监视和量化人类的取水量。关于GRACE,这主要是由于GRACE TWS所需的过滤而导致水提取变量之间的TWS差异减少所致。关于GPS,站密度太低。仅当取水导致地下水或大型地表水体中的水的消耗或恢复而导致TWS的长期变化时,GRACE才可用于支持定量取水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号