首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Society Reviews >Models and mechanisms of Hofmeister effects in electrolyte solutions, and colloid and protein systems revisited
【24h】

Models and mechanisms of Hofmeister effects in electrolyte solutions, and colloid and protein systems revisited

机译:Hofmeister在电解质溶液中的作用的模型和机理,以及胶体和蛋白质系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Specific effects of electrolytes have posed a challenge since the 1880's. The pioneering work was that of Franz Hofmeister who studied specific salt induced protein precipitation. These effects are the rule rather the exception and are ubiquitous in chemistry and biology. Conventional electrostatic theories (Debye-Huckel, DLVO, etc.) cannot explain such effects. Over the past decades it has been recognised that additional quantum mechanical dispersion forces with associated hydration effects acting on ions are missing from theory. In parallel Collins has proposed a phenomenological set of rules (the law of matching water affinities, LMWA) which explain and bring to order the order of ion-ion and ion-surface site interactions at a qualitative level. The two approaches appear to conflict. Although the need for inclusion of quantum dispersion forces in one form or another is not questioned, the modelling has often been misleading and inappropriate, it does not properly describe the chemical nature (kosmotropic/chaotropic or hard/soft) of the interacting species. The success of the LMWA rules lies in the fact that they do. Here we point to the way that the two apparently opposing approaches might be reconciled. Notwithstanding, there are more challenges, which deal with the effect of dissolved gas and its connection to 'hydrophobic' interactions, the problem of water at different temperatures and 'water structure' in the presence of solutes. They take us to another dimension that requires the rebuilding of theoretical foundations.
机译:自1880年代以来,电解质的特殊作用一直是一个挑战。弗朗兹·霍夫迈斯特(Franz Hofmeister)的开创性工作是研究特定盐诱导的蛋白质沉淀。这些作用是规则,而不是例外,在化学和生物学中无处不在。常规静电理论(Debye-Huckel,DLVO等)无法解释这种影响。在过去的几十年中,已经认识到理论上缺少附加的量子力学色散力以及对离子起作用的相关水合效应。同时,柯林斯提出了一套现象学上的规则(匹配水亲和力定律,LMWA),从质的角度解释并整理了离子与离子和离子与表面的相互作用。两种方法似乎冲突。尽管没有质疑是否需要以一种形式或另一种形式包含量子色散力,但是该建模通常具有误导性和不适当性,但它无法正确描述相互作用物种的化学性质(同质/离液或硬/软)。 LMWA规则的成功在于事实。在这里,我们指出两种看似对立的方法可以调和的方式。尽管如此,还有更多的挑战,涉及溶解气体的影响及其与“疏水”相互作用的联系,不同温度下的水问题以及存在溶质的“水结构”。它们将我们带入了一个需要重新构建理论基础的层面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号