首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Fixity of ports to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery: a randomized comparison of cutting versus blunt trocars.
【24h】

Fixity of ports to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery: a randomized comparison of cutting versus blunt trocars.

机译:腹腔镜手术中腹壁端口的固定性:切割套管针和钝套管针的随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Dislodgement of ports from the abdominal wall is a common problem during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate port stability using either cutting or blunt-tipped trocars. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomized to have the secondary ports inserted using either cutting or blunt-tipped trocars. The fixity of ports to the abdominal wall was evaluated at the start and completion of surgery by measuring the total traction force required to displace the ports. Similarly, the friction forces required to displace instruments within the ports were measured. RESULTS: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups (15 patients in each group), and a total of 114 ports (cutting, n = 51; blunt, n = 63) were evaluated. The groups were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, and operating time. The total traction forces needed to displace the 5-mm and 10-mm ports were significantly lower when cutting trocars were used at both the beginning (2.6 vs. 11.8N, p < 0.001, and 6.3 vs. 15.5 N, p = 0.014, respectively) and completion of surgery (1.3 vs. 6.7 N, p < 0.001, and 1.1 vs. 12.0 N, p = 0.001, respectively). The declines in the total traction forces from the start to the completion of surgery were significant for the 5-mm and 10-mm cutting-trocar ports (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively) but not for the blunt-trocar ports (p = 0.088 and p = 0.152, respectively). While no significant differences between the instruments' friction forces and the traction forces of the cutting-trocar ports were observed, the former were significantly lower than the traction force needed to displace the blunt-trocar ports. This explains the significantly greater frequency of spontaneous port dislodgements when cutting ports were employed (25.5% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Port-site bleeding was encountered only in patients (n = 2, 13%) where cutting trocars were used. CONCLUSIONS: Port fixity to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery declines with time. The insertion of ports using a blunt-tipped trocar is associated with significantly greater stability and fixity of the port to the abdominal wall. The use of blunt-tipped trocars is recommended for routine practice in laparoscopic surgery.
机译:背景:在腹腔镜手术期间,端口从腹壁移位是一个普遍的问题。这项研究的目的是使用切割或钝尖的套管针来评估端口稳定性。方法:将接受腹腔镜手术的患者随机分配,使用切割或钝尖的套管针插入次要端口。在手术开始和完成时,通过测量移位这些端口所需的总牵引力来评估端口对腹壁的固定性。同样,测量了将仪器移至端口内所需的摩擦力。结果:30例患者被随机分为两组(每组15例),总共评估了114个端口(切口,n = 51;钝器,n = 63)。这些组在年龄,性别,体重指数和手术时间方面具有可比性。在开始时都使用切割套管针时,移位5毫米和10毫米端口所需的总牵引力显着降低(2.6对11.8N,p <0.001,6.3对15.5 N,p = 0.014, )和手术完成(分别为1.3 vs. 6.7 N,p <0.001和1.1 vs. 12.0 N,p = 0.001)。从开始到完成手术的总牵引力下降对于5毫米和10毫米切针套管针端口显着(分别为p = 0.031和p = 0.043),而对于钝针套管针端口则没有显着下降( p = 0.088和p = 0.152)。虽然没有观察到器械的摩擦力与切针套管口的牵引力之间有显着差异,但前者显着低于置换钝针套管口所需的牵引力。这解释了使用切割端口时自发端口移位的频率明显更高(25.5%对1.6%,p <0.001)。仅在使用切开套管针的患者(n = 2,13%)中发生过端口出血。结论:腹腔镜手术中腹壁端口固定度随时间下降。使用钝尖的套管针插入端口会大大提高端口到腹壁的稳定性和固定性。建议在腹腔镜手术中常规使用钝尖的套管针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号