首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons.
【24h】

Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons.

机译:人体工程学指南在微创手术中的应用:对284位外科医生的问卷调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to obtain an answer for the question: Are ergonomic guidelines applied in the operating room and what are the consequences? METHODS: A total of 1,292 questionnaires were sent by email or handed out to surgeons and residents. The subjects worked mainly in Europe, performing laparoscopic and/or thoracoscopic procedures within the digestive, thoracic, urologic, gynecologic, and pediatric disciplines. RESULTS: In response, 22% of the questionnaires were returned. Overall, the respondents reported discomfort in the neck, shoulders, and back (almost 80%). There was not one specific cause for the physical discomfort. In addition, 89% of the 284 respondents were unaware of ergonomic guidelines, although 100% stated that they find ergonomics important. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of ergonomic guidelines awareness is a major problem that poses a tough position for ergonomics in the operating room.
机译:背景:本研究旨在获得以下问题的答案:是否在手术室中使用了人体工程学指南,其后果是什么?方法:通过电子邮件发送或分发给外科医生和居民的总数为1,292份问卷。这些受试者主要在欧洲工作,在消化,胸,泌尿科,妇科和儿科领域进行腹腔镜和/或胸腔镜手术。结果:22%的问卷被退回。总体而言,受访者表示颈部,肩膀和背部感到不适(几乎80%)。没有造成身体不适的具体原因。此外,在284位受访者中,有89%的人不了解人体工学指导原则,尽管100%的人表示他们认为人体工程学很重要。结论:缺乏人机工程学指南的意识是一个主要问题,对手术室中的人机工程学构成了不利的地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号