首页> 外文期刊>Surgical innovation >A prospective experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of argon plasma coagulation (APC) versus a novel aerosol plasma in a rat model
【24h】

A prospective experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of argon plasma coagulation (APC) versus a novel aerosol plasma in a rat model

机译:一项前瞻性实验研究,以研究大鼠血浆中氩气血浆凝结(APC)与新型气溶胶血浆的腹膜黏附形成

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study to investigate peritoneal adhesion formation of standard argon plasma coagulation (APC) versus aerosol plasma coagulation in a rat model. Methods. Bilateral lesions were created on the abdominal wall of 16 female Wistar rats with standard and aerosol plasma coagulation APC energy in a standard fashion. After 10 days, the rats were killed humanely to evaluate the peritoneal trauma sites. Adhesion incidence, quantity, and quality were scored 10 days postoperatively and studied histopathologically. Results. Average energy intake was 97.7 ± 3.1 J for APC and 93.8 ± 4.2 J for aerosol plasma coagulation. Incidence of adhesion formation was 74.2% for standard APC and 16.1% for aerosol plasma coagulation (P <.0001). Standard APC mainly results in dense adhesions. Histological evaluation revealed no significant difference with regard to the average depth of lesions created by APC and aerosol plasma coagulation (P = 0.21) at day 10; both groups showed an identical morphology of necrosis and granulation tissue formation. Conclusions. This study compares adhesion formation of standard APC versus aerosol plasma coagulation in a rat model. Standard APC produced significantly more adhesions. Aerosol plasma coagulation creates fewer adhesions, which are of lower grade, which seems to be achieved mainly by improved peritoneal conditioning in this animal model.
机译:背景。这是一项前瞻性,随机,对照,单盲研究,旨在研究大鼠模型中标准氩气血浆凝结(APC)与气溶胶血浆凝结的腹膜粘附形成。方法。以标准方式和标准气溶胶血浆凝结APC能量在16只Wistar雌性大鼠的腹壁上形成双侧病变。 10天后,人道地处死大鼠以评估腹膜损伤部位。术后10天对粘连发生率,数量和质量进行评分,并进行组织病理学研究。结果。 APC的平均能量摄入为97.7±3.1 J,气溶胶血浆凝结的平均能量摄入为93.8±4.2J。对于标准APC,粘连形成的发生率为74.2%,对于气溶胶血浆凝结,发生率为16.1%(P <.0001)。标准APC主要导致密合。组织学评估显示,在第10天,APC和气溶胶血浆凝结形成的病变平均深度无明显差异(P = 0.21);两组均显示出相同的坏死形态和肉芽组织形成。结论这项研究比较了在大鼠模型中标准APC与气溶胶血浆凝结形成的粘附力。标准APC产生了更多的附着力。气溶胶血浆凝结产生的粘连较少,属于较低级别,这似乎主要是通过改善动物模型的腹膜条件来实现的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号