首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.
【24h】

Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience.

机译:在常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术中术中内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)清除胆总管结石不会延长住院时间:2年的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: There is still some controversy regarding the optimal timing and best method for the removal of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (IO-ERCP) is an alternative method that should be considered for this procedure. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical outcome of a single-step procedure (IO-ERCP) to remove CBDS, thereby combining two existing high-volume clinical modalities-i.e., laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and ERCP. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2001, 674 patients, 192 male and 482 female, underwent cholecystectomy at our hospital. There were 612 LC (90.8%), 37 converted procedures (5.5%), and 25 open operations (3.7%). In 592 of the patients, (87.8%) intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was performed. In 34 (5.7%) of those who had and IOC, an IO-ERCP was performed. While the surgeon waited for the endoscopist, care was taken to introduce a thin guidewire through the lOC catheter and pass it throughthe sphincter of Oddi, out into the duodenum. This complementary procedure greatly facilitated the subsequent cannulation of the bile ducts. RESULTS: The cannulation frequency of the CBD was 100%. Common bile duct stones were successfully extracted in 93.5%. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), followed by the insertion of a plastic endoprosthesis, was performed in two patients with remaining stones. The CBD of these two patients was cleared by postoperative ERCP. None of the patients developed postoperative pancreatitis. The operating time was prolonged as compared with the time for LC (192 vs 110 mins; p < 0.05). The length of hospitalization for IO-ERCP patients did not differ from that for patients undergoing cholecystectomy alone (2.6 vs 2.1. days; NS). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that elective IO-ERCP is a safe and efficient method for removing CBDS that has a low risk of inducing postoperative pancreatitis and does not prolong postoperative hospitalization. This technique enables perioperative extraction of CBDS without open or laparoscopic surgical exploration of the CBD and can be used safely in a routine clinical setting.
机译:背景:关于切除胆总管结石(CBDS)的最佳时机和最佳方法仍存在争议。术中内镜逆行胰胆管造影(IO-ERCP)是该手术应考虑的另一种方法。我们研究的目的是研究通过单步手术(IO-ERCP)去除CBDS的临床结果,从而结合两种现有的大批量临床模式,即腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)和ERCP。方法:2000年1月至2001年12月,我院对674例患者进行了胆囊切除术,其中男性192例,女性482例。有612个LC(90.8%),37个转换过程(5.5%)和25个未完成操作(3.7%)。在592例患者中,进行了术中胆管造影(IOC)手术(87.8%)。在有IOC的患者中,有34位(5.7%)进行了IO-ERCP。在外科医生等待内镜医师时,要小心地将一根细导丝穿过lOC导管,然后使其穿过Oddi括约肌,进入十二指肠。这种补充程序极大地促进了随后的胆管插管。结果:CBD的插管频率为100%。胆总管结石成功提取率为93.5%。两名内有结石残留的患者进行了内镜括约肌切开术(EST),然后插入了塑料内假体。术后ERCP清除了这两名患者的CBD。没有患者发生术后胰腺炎。与LC时间相比,该操作时间得以延长(192对110分钟; p <0.05)。 IO-ERCP患者的住院时间与仅接受胆囊切除术的患者的住院时间没有差异(2.6 vs 2.1。天; NS)。结论:该研究表明,选择性IO-ERCP是一种安全有效的CBDS清除方法,该方法具有较低的诱发胰腺炎的风险,并且不会延长术后住院时间。该技术无需围手术或CBD的腹腔镜手术探查即可围手术期提取CBDS,并可在常规临床环境中安全使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号