...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience.
【24h】

Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience.

机译:通过电热双极血管装置(EBVS)LigaSure V进行肝切除:早期经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many techniques and devices are available for performing liver resection, such as clamp crushing, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), Hydrojet and dissecting sealer, ultrasonic shears, and, more recently, electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS). In this prospective trial we sought to evaluate the impact of EBVS on hepatic resections. METHODS: From March 2004 to December 2005, 24 patients from our consecutive liver resection series were enrolled in the present study. There were 17 males and 7 females with a mean age of 59.6 years (range = 41-80) who had colonic cancer metastases (18), hepatocarcinoma (3), angioma (2), and intrahepatic lithisasis (1). Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo liver resection via EBVS LigaSure V (12 patients, group A) or ultrasonic shears harmonic scalpel (HS) (12 patients, group B). Hepatic procedures did not differ significantly between the two groups and were as follows: right hepatectomy (2), left hepatectomy (1), bisegmentectomy (14), and segmentectomy (7). RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. The mean operative time was 136.7 min (range = 90-210) in group A and 187.9 min (range = 130-360) in group B. The Pringle maneuver was done in five patients in group A [mean time = 11.4 min (range = 6-12)] and in four patients in group B [mean time = 16 min (range = 9-26)]. The mean blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin concentration from drained fluid on the second postoperative day were 205.8 vs. 506.7 ml, 0.6 vs. 1.1 mmol/L, and 1.0 vs. 2.1 g/L (p < 0.05) for groups A and B, respectively. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.1 vs. 7.8 days. In group B a patient who underwent right hepatectomy for colon cancer metastases had transient hepatic failure. No patients received blood transfusions in group A, while two or more blood units were administered in two cases in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study EBVS proved to be safe and effective for liver resection. By means of this device, statistically significant benefits concerning blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin postoperative leakage were found.
机译:背景:许多技术和设备可用于执行肝脏切除术,例如钳夹压碎,Cavitron超声外科手术抽吸器(CUSA),水力喷射和解剖密封器,超声剪,以及最近的电热双极血管密封系统(EBVS)。在这项前瞻性试验中,我们试图评估EBVS对肝切除的影响。方法:从2004年3月至2005年12月,本研究连续纳入了24例肝切除患者。有17例男性和7例女性,平均年龄为59.6岁(范围为41-80),他们患有结肠癌转移(18),肝癌(3),血管瘤(2)和肝内结石(1)。通过EBVS LigaSure V(12例,A组)或超声剪谐波手术刀(HS)(12例,B组)对患者进行前瞻性随机肝切除。两组之间的肝程序没有显着差异,分别为:右肝切除术(2),左肝切除术(1),二段切除术(14)和节段切除术(7)。结果:两组均无死亡率。 A组的平均手术时间为136.7分钟(范围= 90-210),B组的平均手术时间为187.9分钟(范围= 130-360)。A组的五名患者进行了普林格尔操作[平均时间= 11.4分钟(范围)。 = 6-12)]和B组的4位患者[平均时间= 16分钟(范围= 9-26)]。术后第二天,各组的平均失血量,总胆汁盐和排出的血红蛋白浓度分别为205.8 vs. 506.7 ml,0.6 vs. 1.1 mmol / L和1.0 vs. 2.1 g / L(p <0.05) A和B分别。术后平均住院天数分别为6.1天和7.8天。在B组中,因结肠癌转移而接受右肝切除术的患者具有短暂性肝衰竭。 A组没有患者输血,而B组中有2例患者使用了两个或更多的血液单位。结论:在本研究中,EBVS被证明是安全且有效的肝切除术。通过该装置,发现了有关失血,总胆汁盐和术后血红蛋白渗漏的统计学显着益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号