首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.
【24h】

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for live donor nephrectomy is more time- and cost-effective than standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.

机译:活体供体肾切除术的手动辅助腹腔镜手术(HALS)比标准的腹腔镜肾切除术更省时,更经济。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) was introduced to increase the safety of living donor nephrectomies. Herein we evaluate the first HALS living donor nephrectomies performed at our center. METHODS: Traditional laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLS) (n = 11) and HALS nephrectomies (n = 11) were included in the study. One patient from the TLS group was excluded because the operation was converted to open nephrectomy. We compared the operating times (OT) and warm ischemia times (WIT) for the two procedures and calculated the operating costs. RESULTS: Mean OT was 270 min in the TLS group and 197 min in the HALS group; thus, there was, a significant reduction of 27% with HALS. WIT was 297 sec for the TLS group and 214 sec for the HALS group, for a reduction of 28%. Costs were also lowered for HALS. CONCLUSION: In addition to shortening both OT and WIT, HALS enhances the safety margin of the procedure, especially during trocar placement. It is further helpful in preventing torsion of the kidney and controlling potential bleedings, as well as during vascular stapling and kidney removal.
机译:背景:手动腹腔镜(HALS)被引入以增加活体供肾肾上腺切除术的安全性。在这里,我们评估了在我们中心进行的首批HALS活体供肾肾盂切除术。方法:本研究包括传统的腹腔镜肾切除术(TLS)(n = 11)和HALS肾切除术(n = 11)。 TLS组中的一名患者被排除在外,因为手术已转变为开放式肾切除术。我们比较了两种手术的手术时间(OT)和热缺血时间(WIT),并计算了手术成本。结果:TLS组的平均OT为270分钟,HALS组的平均OT为197分钟。因此,HALS显着降低了27%。 TLS组的WIT为297秒,HALS组的WIT为214秒,减少了28%。 HALS的成本也降低了。结论:HALS除了可以缩短OT和WIT的时间外,还可以提高手术的安全性,特别是在放置套管针时。它还有助于防止肾脏扭曲和控制潜在的出血,以及在血管吻合和肾脏摘除过程中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号