...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Bilateral thoracoscopic stapled volume reduction for bullous vs diffuse emphysema.
【24h】

Bilateral thoracoscopic stapled volume reduction for bullous vs diffuse emphysema.

机译:双侧胸腔镜吻合钉固定术可减少大疱性肺与弥漫性肺气肿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: We compared our results with bullous vs diffuse emphysema by performing a bilateral thoracoscopic stapled volume reduction technique in 15 patients (age 45-80, 10 males, five females). METHODS: Eight patients demonstrated bullous emphysema and seven patients diffuse emphysema. Lung reduction was performed with a bilateral thoracoscopic stapled technique utilizing bovine pericardium in the supine position. RESULTS: Comparison of the bullous versus diffuse groups revealed no significant differences in means for the following variables: length of air leak (7.5 vs 3.3 days); length of stay (8.1 vs 6.5 days); pre-op FEV1, (23% vs 22%); pre-op dyspnea index (3.4 vs 3.6). At 3 months the bullous subset had a highly significant improvement (p < 0.007) in FEV1 (88%) compared with the diffuse subset FEV1 (59%). CONCLUSIONS: These early results suggest that patients with bullous emphysema are at no greater risk and demonstrate a significantly greater improvement in FEV1 than patients with diffuse emphysema.
机译:背景:我们对15例患者(45-80岁,男性10例,女性5例)进行了双侧胸腔镜吻合钉固定术,将结果与大疱性肺气肿与弥漫性肺气肿进行了比较。方法:8例表现为大疱性肺气肿,7例为弥漫性气肿。使用双侧胸腔镜缝合技术在仰卧位使用牛心包进行肺部复位。结果:大疱组和弥散组的比较显示,以下变量的平均值无显着差异:漏气时间(7.5天与3.3天);住院时间(8.1天与6.5天);术前FEV1(23%vs 22%);术前呼吸困难指数(3.4 vs 3.6)。与弥漫性子集FEV1(59%)相比,在3个月时,大疱子集的FEV1(88%)有显着改善(p <0.007)。结论:这些早期结果表明,与弥漫性气肿患者相比,大疱性肺气肿患者没有更高的风险,并且FEV1的改善显着更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号