首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Reply to: Doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3: Re: Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised trial (2010 (24):1842-1848) and doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1921-9: Re: α-Defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (2012 (26):627-631)
【24h】

Reply to: Doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3: Re: Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomised trial (2010 (24):1842-1848) and doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1921-9: Re: α-Defensins and hsCRP levels in inflammatory response of standard and laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy (2012 (26):627-631)

机译:回复:Doi:10.1007 / s00464-010-0887-3:回复:单次脐带切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经典腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疼痛评分不同:一项随机试验(2010(24):1842-1848)和doi:10.1007 / s00464 -011-1921-9:Re:标准和腹腔镜单点胆囊切除术的炎症反应中的α-防御素和hsCRP水平(2012(26):627-631)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We appreciate the comments from Cuneyt Kayaalp regarding our recent articles in Surgical Endoscopy [1, 2]. We agree that some results are confusing, and we thank him for his interest in our study. The first study published in 2010 [1] had a misprint in the text, and the correct results are those presented in Table 1. Some researchers who have accepted the data in Table 1 as correct have asked us to elucidate the correct result.
机译:我们感谢Cuneyt Kayaalp对我们最近在外科内窥镜检查中发表的文章的评论[1,2]。我们同意某些结果令人困惑,并且感谢他对我们的研究感兴趣。 2010年发表的第一项研究[1]的文字打错了,正确的结果如表1所示。一些接受了表1数据正确的研究人员要求我们阐明正确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号