首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections
【24h】

Prospective evaluation of peritoneal fluid contamination following transabdominal vs. transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resections

机译:腹腔镜左侧结直肠切除术中经腹与经肛门标本提取后腹膜液污染的前瞻性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) in colorectal surgery prevents the need for an enlarged port site or minilaparotomy to extract the surgical specimen. The downside of this technique may be an increased risk of bacterial contamination of the peritoneal cavity from the external milieu. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the peritoneal bacterial contamination in NOSE and non-NOSE laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Methods Consecutive patients operated for sigmoid diverticulitis with laparoscopic approach and transanal extraction of the specimen from January to December 2010 at our university hospital were enrolled. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in the same study period with conventional specimen extraction were used as reference. Peritoneal fluid samples were collected under sterile conditions at the end of the procedure and sent for gram stain as well as anaerobic, aerobic, and fungal cultures. Results Twenty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis with transanal NOSE, while 9 patients underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with conventional specimen extraction during the same period. The two groups were successfully matched 1:2 (17 NOSE and 9 non-NOSE) according age, sex, ASA, and Charlson comorbidity score. The contamination rate of peritoneal fluid was 100% vs. 88.9% in NOSE and non- NOSE procedures, respectively (P = 0.23). Overall and major complications rates were 27.6% vs. 11.10% (P = 0.41) and 5.08% vs. 11.1% (P = 1) in NOSE vs. non- NOSE procedures, respectively. In the NOSE group there was a statistically significant lower consumption of oral paracetamol (P = 0.007) and of oral tramadol (P = 0.02). Conclusions Although a higher peritoneal contamination was found in the NOSE procedures, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes relative to standard approach. Avoiding a minilaparotomy to extract the specimen resulted in a significantly lower postoperative analgesic requirement in the NOSE group.
机译:背景技术大肠手术中的自然孔口标本提取(NOSE)防止了需要扩大的端口位或进行小切口开腹术来提取手术标本。该技术的缺点可能是增加了外界环境污染腹膜腔细菌的风险。这项研究的目的是前瞻性地分析腹腔镜结肠镜和非鼻腔镜结肠直肠手术中的腹膜细菌污染。方法选择2010年1月至12月在我校医院行腹腔镜手术并经肛门抽取标本的乙状结肠憩室炎患者。在同一研究期内行腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术并采用常规标本提取的患者作为参考。在手术结束时,在无菌条件下收集腹膜液样品,并将其用于革兰氏染色以及厌氧,好氧和真菌培养。结果29例因肛门憩室炎而经肛门NOSE的患者接受了腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术,同期有9例患者采用常规标本抽取术进行了腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术。根据年龄,性别,ASA和Charlson合并症评分,两组患者成功匹配1:2(17个NOSE和9个非NOSE)。腹膜液的污染率为100%,而NOSE和非NOSE程序分别为88.9%(P = 0.23)。在NOSE与非NOSE手术中,总体和主要并发症发生率分别为27.6%对11.10%(P = 0.41)和5.08%对11.1%(P = 1)。在NOSE组中,口服对乙酰氨基酚(P = 0.007)和口服曲马多(P = 0.02)的统计上显着降低。结论尽管在NOSE手术中发现了较高的腹膜污染,但与标准方法相比,临床结局没有显着差异。避免使用微型腹腔镜开腹术来提取标本,从而导致了NOSE组术后镇痛的需求明显降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号