首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.
【24h】

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group.

机译:手助腹腔镜手术与标准腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病:一项前瞻性随机试验。 HALS研究小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: We compare the use of the HandPort(TM)device in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) to standard laparoscopic surgery (SLS) in the treatment of colorectal disease. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study was conducted with the participation of 10 advanced laparoscopic surgeons. Forty patients with indications for elective resection of benign colorectal disease or incurable malignant disease were randomized to one of the two treatment arms (22 HALS, 18 SLS). Main outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, HandPort(TM) performance, postoperative pain, time to oral intake, return of bowel function, length of stay, morbidity, and functional recovery. RESULTS: The patients in each group were similar with regard to age, sex, weight, diagnosis, coexisting medical disease, and preoperative functional status. Operative time was comparable for hand-assisted laparoscopy (152 +/- 66 min) and standard laparoscopy (141 +/- 54 min) (p = 0.58). Incision length for specimen extraction/bowel anastomosis was similar (HALS 7.4 cm vs SLS 7.0 cm). Three of 22 HALS cases (14%) were converted, as compared with four of 18 (22%) in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.68). Return of bowel function occurred by the 3rd postoperative day for the majority of patients in both groups (HALS 77%, SLS 78%). There was no difference in length of stay (HALS 7.0 days [range, 2-12] vs SLS 6.0 days [range, 2-10], p = 0.25). Severity of postoperative pain and rate of functional recovery were equivalent. One major complication occurred in each group. There were three wound infections in the laparoscopy group. No patient required reoperation, and there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective for benign and noncurative colorectal resection. As compared to standard laparoscopic surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopy retains the benefits of minimally invasive surgery and may allow the surgeon to perform complex operations more easily.
机译:背景:我们将HandPort™设备在手助腹腔镜手术(HALS)中与标准腹腔镜手术(SLS)在大肠疾病治疗中的使用进行了比较。方法:在10名高级腹腔镜手术医生的参与下进行了一项前瞻性,随机,多中心研究。将有良性大肠疾病或顽固性恶性疾病选择性切除的适应症的40例患者随机分配到两个治疗组之一(22 HALS,18 SLS)。主要结局指标包括手术时间,失血量,HandPort(TM)性能,术后疼痛,口服时间,肠功能恢复,住院时间,发病率和功能恢复。结果:各组患者在年龄,性别,体重,诊断,并存医学疾病和术前功能状态方面相似。手动腹腔镜手术(152 +/- 66分钟)和标准腹腔镜手术(141 +/- 54分钟)的手术时间相当(p = 0.58)。标本提取/肠吻合的切口长度相似(HALS 7.4 cm vs SLS 7.0 cm)。 22例HALS病例中有3例(14%)被转换,而腹腔镜检查组中18例中有4例(22%)发生了转化(p = 0.68)。两组中大多数患者在术后第三天出现肠功能恢复(HALS 77%,SLS 78%)。住院时间无差异(HALS 7.0天[范围2-12]与SLS 6.0天[范围2-10],p = 0.25)。术后疼痛的严重程度和功能恢复率相等。每组发生一次主要并发症。腹腔镜检查组有3处伤口感染。没有患者需要再次手术,也没有死亡。结论:手工腹腔镜手术对于良性和非治愈性结直肠切除术是安全有效的。与标准的腹腔镜手术相比,手动腹腔镜保留了微创手术的优势,并且可以使外科医生更轻松地执行复杂的手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号