...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Video. Transanal specimen retrieval using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) system in minimally invasive colon resection.
【24h】

Video. Transanal specimen retrieval using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) system in minimally invasive colon resection.

机译:视频。在微创结肠切除术中使用经肛门内窥镜显微手术(TEM)系统进行经肛门标本取回。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During laparoscopic colectomy, the specimen is retrieved through substantial incisions, which increase postoperative pain, wound infections, and incisional hernias. In the era of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), incisionless transrectal approaches for colon resections have been investigated with promising results [4-6]. Transanal retrieval of the colonic specimen in laparoscopic colectomy has been described but not widely adopted, although it seems to be an appealing step towards NOTES colectomy. We have used the TEM rectoscope (Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) as a retrieval conduit, which facilitates transanal extraction of the specimen, and protects the rectal edge and anal sphincter during laparoscopic left colectomy.After standard laparoscopic dissection and vascular control, the colon is divided distally, whereas the proximal colonic end is ligated to prevent fecal spillage. The TEM rectoscope is advanced through the rectal stump. The proximal colon is grasped and withdrawn through the rectoscope. The colon is stapled off proximally, and the specimen is removed transanally. An anvil is introduced into the pelvis through the rectoscope and inserted in the descending colon through a colotomy, which is subsequently sealed with an endo-loop. The rectoscope is withdrawn, and the rectal stump edge is stapled off. A circular stapler is introduced in the rectum, and end-to-end anastomosis is performed.The extraction incisions in laparoscopic colectomy increase invasiveness and compromise the "purity" of the laparoscopic approach. Retrieval of the specimen through natural orifices constitutes a stepping stone in the transition to future incisionless NOTES colectomy. These techniques have not been widely adopted because of technical difficulties and concerns regarding trauma. In our experience, transanal retrieval of the colonic specimen is hampered by friction between the specimen and the rectum, which requires countertraction to the edges of the open rectal stump. These manipulations are time consuming and increase the risk of injury, even when retrieval bags are used. The TEM rectoscope allows gentle dilation of the anus, provides stability during extraction, and protects the edges of the rectum, therefore decreasing the risk of rectal or anal canal injuries. It maintains pneumoperitoneum and eases retrieval of the specimen through the large-caliber metal conduit. Alternative options in the form of a rigid conduit would be the use of the transanal endoscopic operation device (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), the plastic McCartney tube (Tyco Healthcare, Norwalk, CT, USA) used for transvaginal operations, or an anecdotally reported, "homemade" rectoscope from a customized polyvinyl chloride tube. Potential limitations of this technique include the increased cost of acquiring and using the TEM rectoscope, although this should not be significant if this reusable system is already available for transanal procedures. The 4 cm diameter of the TEM rectoscope can also be a limiting factor in the case of large, bulky, incompressible specimens or large colonic tumors. We have also avoided using this technique in patients with preexisting anal sphincter dysfunction and fecal incontinence, as well as in the presence of severe perianal disease (i.e., fistulae or fissures). Naturally, the open lumen in the peritoneal cavity raises concerns regarding bacterial contamination and potential tumor cell seeding in cases of cancer. Preliminary evidence on these issues comes from TEM and NOTES research without obvious signs of increased risk currently. We do not perform preoperative bowel preparation for our colectomies, but we do perform rectal enema with Betadine solution at the beginning of the procedure.Use of the TEM system facilitates transanal removal of the specimen and protects the anorectum during laparoscopic colectomy.
机译:在腹腔镜结肠切除术中,通过大量切口取出标本,这会增加术后疼痛,伤口感染和切口疝。在自然孔腔内镜手术(NOTES)时代,已经研究了无切口经直肠直肠切除术,并取得了可喜的成果[4-6]。腹腔镜结肠切除术中结肠标本经肛门取回已有报道,但未被广泛采用,尽管这似乎是进行NOTES结肠切除术的一个吸引人的步骤。我们将TEM直肠镜(Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corporation,Vernon Hills,IL,USA)用作取回导管,该导管可方便地经肛门抽取标本,并在腹腔镜左结肠切除术中保护直肠边缘和肛门括约肌。和血管控制,将结肠向远端分开,而结扎结肠的近端以防止粪便溢出。 TEM直肠镜穿过直肠残端。将近端结肠通过直肠镜抓紧并抽出。将结肠向近端装钉,并经肛门取出标本。通过直肠镜将砧座插入骨盆,并通过内窥镜切开术将其插入降结肠,随后用内环将其密封。撤回直肠镜,并缝合直肠残端。在直肠中引入圆形吻合器,并进行端到端吻合。腹腔镜结肠切除术中的切开切口增加了侵入性,并损害了腹腔镜手术方法的“纯度”。通过自然孔口取回标本构成了向未来无切口NOTES结肠切除术过渡的垫脚石。由于技术上的困难和对创伤的关注,这些技术尚未得到广泛采用。根据我们的经验,结肠和直肠之间的摩擦阻碍了结肠直肠标本的经肛门取回,这需要与开放性直肠残端的边缘相抵触。这些操作既费时又增加受伤的风险,即使使用取物袋也是如此。 TEM直肠镜可使肛门温和扩张,在拔除过程中保持稳定,并保护直肠边缘,因此降低了直肠或肛管受伤的风险。它保持气腹,并易于通过大口径金属导管取出标本。刚性导管形式的替代选择是使用经肛门内窥镜手术装置(Karl Storz,德国图特林根),用于经阴道手术的塑料麦卡尼管(Tyco Healthcare,Norwalk,CT,美国)或轶事。据报道,“自制”直肠镜来自于定制的聚氯乙烯管。该技术的潜在局限性包括增加获取和使用TEM直肠镜的成本,尽管如果这种可重复使用的系统已经可以用于经肛门手术,那么这并不重要。在大,笨重,不可压缩的标本或大结肠肿瘤的情况下,TEM直肠镜的4厘米直径也是一个限制因素。我们还避免在已存在肛门括约肌功能障碍和大便失禁以及存在严重肛周疾病(即瘘管或裂痕)的患者中使用此技术。自然,腹膜腔中的开放腔引起了对细菌污染和癌症病例中潜在的肿瘤细胞播种的担忧。关于这些问题的初步证据来自TEM和NOTES研究,目前尚无明显增加风险的迹象。我们不为鞘膜切除术进行术前肠道准备,但在手术开始时我们先用Betadine溶液进行直肠灌肠。使用TEM系统有助于经腹腔切除标本并在腹腔镜结肠切除术中保护肛门直肠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号