...
首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT.
【24h】

A new rating scale for age-related white matter changes applicable to MRI and CT.

机译:针对年龄相关性白质变化的新评级量表,适用于MRI和CT。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI is more sensitive than CT for detection of age-related white matter changes (ARWMC). Most rating scales estimate the degree and distribution of ARWMC either on CT or on MRI, and they differ in many aspects. This makes it difficult to compare CT and MRI studies. To be able to study the evolution and possible effect of drug treatment on ARWMC in large patient samples, it is necessary to have a rating scale constructed for both MRI and CT. We have developed and evaluated a new scale and studied ARWMC in a large number of patients examined with both MRI and CT. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with ARWMC on either CT or MRI were recruited and a complementary examination (MRI or CT) performed. The patients came from 4 centers in Europe, and the scans were rated by 4 raters on 1 occasion with the new ARWMC rating scale. The interrater reliability was evaluated by using kappa statistics. The degree and distribution of ARWMC in CT and MRI scans were compared in different brain areas. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was good for MRI (kappa=0.67) and moderate for CT (kappa=0.48). MRI was superior in detection of small ARWMC, whereas larger lesions were detected equally well with both CT and MRI. In the parieto-occipital and infratentorial areas, MRI detected significantly more ARWMC than did CT. In the frontal area and basal ganglia, no differences between modalities were found. When a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence was used, MRI detected significantly more lesions than CT in frontal and parieto-occipital areas. No differences were found in basal ganglia and infratentorial areas. CONCLUSIONS: We present a new ARWMC scale applicable to both CT and MRI that has almost equal sensitivity, except for certain regions. The interrater reliability was slightly better for MRI, as was the detectability of small lesions.
机译:背景与目的:MRI比CT对年龄相关的白质变化(ARWMC)的检测更为敏感。大多数评级量表在CT或MRI上估计ARWMC的程度和分布,并且在许多方面存在差异。这使得难以比较CT和MRI研究。为了能够研究药物治疗对大样本患者中ARWMC的演变和可能的影响,有必要为MRI和CT制定评级量表。我们已经开发并评估了新的量表,并在大量接受MRI和CT检查的患者中研究了ARWMC。方法:招募了77例接受CT或MRI检查的ARWMC患者,并进行了补充检查(MRI或CT)。这些患者来自欧洲的4个中心,并且使用新的ARWMC评分量表对扫描进行了4次评估。使用kappa统计数据评估了间际可靠性。比较了不同大脑区域在CT和MRI扫描中ARWMC的程度和分布。结果:Interrater可靠性对MRI良好(kappa = 0.67),对CT中等(kappa = 0.48)。 MRI在检测较小的ARWMC方面优越,而CT和MRI均能很好地检测到较大的病变。在顶枕和下颅骨区域,MRI检测出的ARWMC明显多于CT。在额叶区域和基底神经节之间,没有发现差异。当使用液体衰减的反转恢复序列时,MRI在额叶和顶枕区的病变明显多于CT。在基底神经节和下神经鞘区域未发现差异。结论:我们提出了一种适用于CT和MRI的新型ARWMC量表,除了某些区域外,其灵敏度几乎相等。 MRI的间质可靠性稍好,小病变的可检测性也更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号