首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Drivers of costs associated with reperfusion therapy in acute stroke: The interventional management of stroke III trial
【24h】

Drivers of costs associated with reperfusion therapy in acute stroke: The interventional management of stroke III trial

机译:急性中风再灌注治疗相关费用的驱动因素:中风III试验的介入治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Purpose: The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III study tested the effect of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) alone when compared with intravenous tPA followed by endovascular therapy and collected cost data to assess the economic implications of the 2 therapies. This report describes the factors affecting the costs of the initial hospitalization for acute stroke subjects from the United States. METHODS-: Prospective cost analysis of the US subjects was treated with intravenous tPA alone or with intravenous tPA followed by endovascular therapy in the IMS III trial. Results were compared with expected Medicare payments. RESULTS-: The adjusted cost of a stroke admission in the study was $35 130 for subjects treated with endovascular therapy after intravenous tPA treatment and $25 630 for subjects treated with intravenous tPA alone (P<0.0001). Significant factors related to costs included treatment group, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, time from stroke onset to intravenous tPA, age, stroke location, and comorbid diabetes mellitus. The mean cost for subjects who had routine use of general anesthesia as part of endovascular therapy was $46 444 when compared with $30 350 for those who did not have general anesthesia. The costs of embolectomy for IMS III subjects and patients from the National Inpatient Sample cohort exceeded the Medicare diagnosis-related group payment in ≥75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS-: Minimizing the time to start of intravenous tPA and decreasing the use of routine general anesthesia may improve the cost-effectiveness of medical and endovascular therapy for acute stroke.
机译:背景与目的:卒中的介入治疗(IMS)III研究测试了单独的静脉内组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)与静脉内tPA并随后进行血管内治疗的效果,并收集了成本数据以评估这两种疗法的经济意义。本报告描述了影响美国急性中风患者初次住院费用的因素。方法-:在IMS III试验中,对美国受试者的前瞻性成本分析采用单独的静脉tPA或静脉tPA,然后进行血管内治疗。将结果与预期的Medicare付款进行了比较。结果-:在研究中,接受中风tPA治疗后接受血管内治疗的受试者的中风入院调整后费用为$ 35 130,单独接受静脉tPA治疗的受试者为$ 25 630(P <0.0001)。与费用相关的重要因素包括治疗组,美国国立卫生研究院中风量表基线,从中风发作到静脉tPA的时间,年龄,中风部位和合并症糖尿病。常规使用全身麻醉作为血管内治疗一部分的受试者的平均费用为46 444美元,而没有全身麻醉的受试者的平均费用为30 350美元。在≥75%的患者中,针对IMS III受试者和来自国家住院样本队列的患者进行栓子切除术的费用超过了与Medicare诊断相关的小组付款。结论:最小化开始静脉tPA的时间并减少常规全身麻醉的使用可能会提高急性卒中的药物治疗和血管内治疗的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号