首页> 外文期刊>Stroke: A Journal of Cerebral Circulation >Cerebral perfusion and blood pressure do not affect perihematoma edema growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage
【24h】

Cerebral perfusion and blood pressure do not affect perihematoma edema growth in acute intracerebral hemorrhage

机译:脑灌注和血压不影响急性脑出血中血肿周围水肿的增长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: The pathogenesis of perihematoma edema in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unknown but has been hypothesized to be ischemic. In the ICH Acutely Decreasing Arterial Pressure Trial (ICH ADAPT), perihematoma cerebral blood flow (CBF) was reduced but was unaffected by blood pressure (BP) reduction. Using ICH ADAPT data, we tested the hypotheses that edema growth is associated with reduced CBF and lower systolic BP. METHODS-: Noncontrast computed tomographic scans in patients with ICH were obtained at baseline, 2 hours, and 24 hours after randomization to target systolic BPs of <150 or <180 mm Hg. Computed tomography perfusion imaging was performed at 2 hours, and mean relative CBF was calculated in visibly edematous perihematoma tissue. Edema volumes were measured using a Hounsfield unit threshold of 5 to 23 at each time-point. RESULTS-: Patients were randomized at a median (interquartile range) of 7.4 (12.8) hours after onset. Treatment groups (n=34, <150 and n=33, <180 target) were balanced with respect to baseline systolic BP and acute ICH volume. Relative edema growth at 24 hours in the <150 group (0.11±0.19) was similar to that in the <180 group (0.09±0.16 mL; P=0.727). Absolute CBF was lower in the edematous region (35.67±13.1 mL/100 g per minute) when compared with that in the contralateral tissue (43.7±11.7 mL/100 g per minute; P<0.0001). Linear regression indicated that neither systolic BP change (β=-0.022; 95% confidence interval, -0.002 to 0.001) nor perihematoma relative CBF (β=-0.144; 95% confidence interval, -0.647 to 0.167) predicted edema growth. CONCLUSIONS-: Lower perihematoma CBF and BP treatment do not exacerbate edema growth. These data do not support a cytotoxic edema pathogenesis.
机译:背景与目的-:脑出血(ICH)中血肿周围水肿的发病机制尚不清楚,但据推测是缺血性的。在ICH急性降压试验(ICH ADAPT)中,血肿周围血肿的脑血流量(CBF)降低了,但不受血压(BP)降低的影响。使用ICH ADAPT数据,我们检验了水肿增长与CBF降低和收缩压降低相关的假设。方法:在基线,<150 mm Hg或<180 mm Hg的目标收缩压随机分配后的基线,2小时和24小时,对ICH患者进行非对比计算机断层扫描。在2小时时进行计算机断层扫描灌注成像,并计算可见水肿性血肿周围组织的平均相对CBF。在每个时间点使用Hounsfield单位阈值5到23测量浮肿量。结果-:患者在发病后的中位数(四分位间距)为7.4(12.8)小时后被随机分组​​。治疗组(n = 34,<150和n = 33,<180目标)在基线收缩压和急性ICH量方面达到平衡。 <150组(0.11±0.19)在24小时的相对水肿增长与<180组(0.09±0.16 mL; P = 0.727)相似。与对侧组织相比,水肿区域的绝对CBF较低(35.67±13.1 mL / 100 g /分钟),对侧组织则为(43.7±11.7 mL / 100 g /分钟; P <0.0001)。线性回归表明,收缩压变化(β= -0.022; 95%置信区间,-0.002至0.001)和血肿周围相对CBF(β= -0.144; 95%置信区间,-0.647至0.167)均不能预测水肿。结论-:下血肿周围血肿CBF和BP治疗不会加剧水肿的增长。这些数据不支持细胞毒性水肿的发病机理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号