...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.
【24h】

Fully specified bootstrap confidence intervals for the difference of two independent binomial proportions based on the median unbiased estimator.

机译:基于中位数无偏估计量的两个独立二项式比例之差的完全指定的自举置信区间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In studies in which a binary response for each subject is observed, the success probability and functions of this quantity are of interest. The use of confidence intervals has been increasingly encouraged as complementary to, and indeed preferable to, p-values as the primary expression of the impact of sampling uncertainty on the findings. The asymptotic confidence interval, based on a normal approximation, is often considered, but this interval can have poor statistical properties when the sample size is small and/or when the success probability is near 0 or 1. In this paper, an estimate of the risk difference based on median unbiased estimates (MUEs) of the two group probabilities is proposed. A corresponding confidence interval is derived using a fully specified bootstrap sample space. The proposed method is compared with Chen's quasi-exact method, Wald intervals and Agresti and Caffo's method with regard to mean square error and coverage probability. For a variety of settings, the MUE-based estimate of risk difference has mean square error uniformly smaller than maximum likelihood estimate within a certain range of risk difference. The fully specified bootstrap had better coverage probability in the tail area than Chen's quasi-exact method, Wald intervals and Agresti and Caffo's intervals.
机译:在研究中观察到每个受试者都有二元反应的研究中,此数量的成功概率和功能令人关注。越来越多地鼓励使用置信区间作为p值的补充,甚至更可取,因为p值是抽样不确定性对调查结果影响的主要表达。通常考虑基于正态近似的渐近置信区间,但是当样本量较小和/或成功概率接近0或1时,该区间的统计属性可能较差。提出了基于两组概率的中位数无偏估计(MUE)的风险差异。使用完全指定的引导程序样本空间可以得出相应的置信区间。将该方法与Chen的准精确方法,Wald区间以及Agresti和Caffo方法的均方差和覆盖概率进行了比较。对于各种设置,基于MUE的风险差异估算值在一定的风险差异范围内均方差均小于最大似然估算值。与Chen的准精确方法,Wald间隔以及Agresti和Caffo的间隔相比,完全指定的引导程序在尾部区域具有更好的覆盖概率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号