首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in medicine >Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data.
【24h】

Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data.

机译:基于似然度的一致性测试,用于分析确定的双对多项式数据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The classic twin model design has a wide application in human genetics. Under the assumption that nongenetic effects are shared to the same degree by monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, a test of the equality of casewise concordances between MZ and DZ twins provides a clue to the influence of genetic and environmental factors on a disease. The casewise concordance is the conditional probability that given that one member of a twin pair is affected, the other is also affected. When disease prevalence is low or cost-effectiveness is considered, collection of twin pairs by ascertainment for performing casewise concordance analysis is required. In this article, by defining an overall casewise concordance parameter, several likelihood-based tests, such as likelihood ratio test LR, score test Score, the usual Wald test Wald and an alternative Wald test WaldA are investigated for a test of the equality of concordances between ascertained MZ and DZ twin pairs under multinomial models. Simulation studies were conducted for data with small sample sizes. The results show that the type I error rates and power of LR and Score are stable only when the overall casewise concordances are not extremely small or large. The Wald has higher power performance in most cases but would slightly inflate type I error rates; the WaldA is the most robust and recommended approach.
机译:经典的双胞胎模型设计在人类遗传学中具有广泛的应用。在单卵双胞胎(MZ)和双卵双胞胎(DZ)双胞胎对非遗传效应具有相同程度的假设的前提下,对MZ和DZ双胞胎的个案协调一致的检验提供了遗传和环境因素对疾病。逐案一致性是给定一对双胞胎中的一个受到影响而另一对也受到影响的条件概率。当疾病流行率低或考虑成本效益时,需要通过确定收集双胞胎对进行病例一致性分析。在本文中,通过定义总体的案例一致性指标,研究了几种基于似然性的测试,例如似然比测试LR,得分测试Score,常规Wald测试Wald和替代Wald测试WaldA,以测试一致性是否相等多项式模型下确定的MZ和DZ孪生对之间的关​​系。针对小样本数据进行了模拟研究。结果表明,仅当总体个案一致性不太小或太大时,I型错误率以及LR和Score的幂才稳定。在大多数情况下,Wald具有更高的电源性能,但会略微提高I型错误率。 WaldA是最可靠且推荐的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号