首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of modern physics >Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument
【24h】

Erich Kretschmann as a proto-logical-empiricist: Adventures and misadventures of the point-coincidence argument

机译:埃里希·克雷奇曼(Erich Kretschmann):作为原始逻辑经验主义者:点重合论证的历险与不幸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present paper attempts to show that a 1915 article by Erich Kretschmann must be credited not only for being the source of Einstein's point-coincidence, but also for having anticipated the main lines of the logical-empiricist interpretation of general relativity. Whereas Kretschmann was inspired by the work of Mach and Poincaré, Einstein inserted Kretschmann's point-coincidence parlance into the context of Ricci and Levi-Civita's absolute differential calculus. Kretschmann himself realized this and turned the point-coincidence argument against Einstein in his second and more famous 1918 paper. While Einstein had taken nothing from Kretschmann but the expression "point-coincidences", the logical empiricists, however, instinctively dragged along with it the entire apparatus of Kretschmann's conventionalism. Disappointingly, in their interpretation of general relativity, the logical empiricists unwittingly replicated some epistemological remarks Kretschmann had written before general relativity even existed.
机译:本文试图表明,埃里希·克雷奇曼(Erich Kretschmann)在1915年发表的一篇文章不仅应归因于爱因斯坦的点符合,而且还应归因于对广义相对论的逻辑经验主义解释的主要依据。克雷奇曼的灵感来自马赫和庞加莱的著作,而爱因斯坦则将克雷奇曼的点重合的说法引入了里奇和列维-奇维塔的绝对微分学背景。克雷奇曼本人意识到了这一点,并在他的第二篇也是更著名的1918年论文中将点重合论点转向了爱因斯坦。尽管爱因斯坦从克雷奇曼身上只取了“点巧合”一词,但逻辑经验主义者本能地将克雷奇曼传统主义的整个手段拖延了下来。令人失望的是,逻辑经验主义者在解释广义相对论时无意间复制了克雷奇曼在广义相对论出现之前就已经写过的一些认识论言论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号