首页> 外文期刊>Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics >Measuring health care costs of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance in the U.S.: A comparison of survey and claims data
【24h】

Measuring health care costs of individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance in the U.S.: A comparison of survey and claims data

机译:在美国测量由雇主赞助的健康保险的个人的医疗费用:调查和理赔数据的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the core health expenditure survey in the United States, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is increasingly being used by statistical agencies to track expenditures by disease. However, while MEPS provides a wealth of data, its sample size precludes examination of spending on all but the most prevalent health conditions. To overcome this issue, statistical agencies have turned to other public data sources, such as Medicare and Medicaid claims data, when available. No comparable publicly available data exist for those with employer-sponsored insurance. While large proprietary claims databases may be an option, the data are convenience samples and the extent to which the data are representative for employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) enrollees is not known. This study compared MEPS and MarketScan estimates of annual per person health care spending on individuals with employer-sponsored insurance coverage. Both total spending and the distribution of annual per person spending differed across the two data sources, with MEPS estimates 10 percent lower on average than estimates from MarketScan. These differences appeared to be a function of both underrepresentation of high expenditure cases and underreporting across the remaining distribution of spending.
机译:作为美国的核心卫生支出调查,医疗机构的医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)越来越多地被统计机构用来跟踪疾病支出。但是,尽管MEPS提供了大量数据,但由于其样本量大,因此无法检查除最普遍的健康状况外的所有支出。为了克服此问题,统计机构已转向其他公共数据源,例如Medicare和Medicaid索赔数据(如果有)。没有由雇主赞助的保险的可比较的公开数据。虽然可能会选择大型的专有索赔数据库,但这些数据只是方便性示例,并且该数据对于雇主赞助的保险(ESI)注册者的代表程度尚不清楚。这项研究比较了MEPS和MarketScan对有雇主赞助的保险的个人的年度人均医疗保健支出的估计。在这两个数据源中,总支出和人均年度支出的分布都不同,MEPS估计的平均水平比MarketScan的估计低10%。这些差异似乎是由于高支出案件的代表性不足和剩余支出分配方面的漏报所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号