首页> 外文期刊>Strain >Reply to 'Comments on 'Geomechanical and Geochemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in the Earth's Crust' by A. Carpinteri and A. Manuello' by U. Bardi and G. Comoretto
【24h】

Reply to 'Comments on 'Geomechanical and Geochemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in the Earth's Crust' by A. Carpinteri and A. Manuello' by U. Bardi and G. Comoretto

机译:U. Bardi和G. Comoretto对“ A. Carpinteri和A. Manuello关于'地壳中的压电核裂变反应的地球力学和地球化学证据的评论”的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the paper entitled Comments on Geomechanical and Geochemical Evidence of Piezonuclear Fission Reactions in the Earth's Crust' by A. Carpinteri and Manuello by U. Bardi and G. Comoretto, the authors criticise the hypothesis based on piezonuclear reactions for the interpretation of the compositional evolution of the Earth's crust. We report a detailed reply of how the traditional theories, used by the authors of the comments, are obviously inadequate to describe this new kind of nuclear phenomena. Only very recently, independent authors proposed a theoretical model explaining the anomalous energy emissions in the form of neutrons, involved in piezonuclear reactions, during fracture of nonradioactive rocks. It is also known how the evidences that Bardi and Comoretto claim to be non-existent could be found in many independent works that appeared in most important journals about unexplained questions of the Earth's crust and environment. The data reported in the original work and the details included in this reply show that it is incorrect to consider impossible or simply to ignore the existence of unexplained phenomena only because they cannot be described by traditional models and conventional theories.
机译:U. Bardi和G.Comoretto在A.Carpinteri和Manuello撰写的题为《对地壳中的压电核裂变反应的地球力学和地球化学证据的评论》的论文中,作者批评了基于压电核反应的假说来解释成分演化。的地壳。我们报告了评论者的详细答复,这些评论的作者使用的传统理论显然不足以描述这种新型核现象。直到最近,独立作者才提出了一种理论模型,解释非放射性岩石破裂过程中涉及压电核反应的中子形式的异常能量排放。众所周知,如何在许多独立的著作中找到巴迪和科莫雷托声称不存在的证据,这些著作出现在关于地壳和环境的无法解释的问题的最重要的期刊上。原始工作中报告的数据以及此答复中包含的详细信息表明,仅仅因为无法用传统模型和传统理论来描述,就不可能认为不可能或仅仅忽略无法解释的现象的存在是不正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号