...
首页> 外文期刊>Sedimentology: Journal of the International Association of Sedimentologists >Techniques to measure grain-size distributions of loamy sediments: a comparative study of ten instruments for wet analysis
【24h】

Techniques to measure grain-size distributions of loamy sediments: a comparative study of ten instruments for wet analysis

机译:测量壤质沉积物粒度分布的技术:十种湿法分析仪器的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ten instruments for measuring the grain-size distribution of loamy sediments in water were tested in a comparative study. Instruments tested were: the Malvern Mastersizer S, the Coulter LS 200, the Fritsch Analysette 22 ( version C), the Horiba Partica LA-950, the Sedigraph 5100, the Atterberg cylinder, the Coulter Multisizer 3, the CIS-100, the EyeTech and the image analysis software Histolab. The first four instruments use laser diffraction. The Sedigraph and Atterberg cylinder are based on sedimentation. The Coulter Multisizer 3 uses impedance measurements and the last three instruments use optical techniques. Grain-size analyses were carried out on four sediments with median grain diameters of approximately 35, 30, 12 and 9 mu m, respectively, and with no particles > 90 mu m. The laser diffraction instruments produced the best results for the various criteria considered in this study, followed by the Coulter Multisizer 3 ( electrical sensing zone technique), the sedimentation techniques and the optical methods. However, the study also showed that there is no such thing as an 'ideal' method because techniques may score differently according to the criterion tested. An appropriate evaluation thus requires that various criteria be considered. Issues to be taken into account are: type of sediment, quantity of sediment available, speed of measurement, complexity of the measurement protocol, processing of the data, reproducibility of the results and the specific aims of the study undertaken.
机译:在比较研究中,测试了十种用于测量水中壤土沉积物粒度分布的仪器。测试的仪器包括:Malvern Mastersizer S,Coulter LS 200,Fritsch Analysette 22(C版),Horiba Partica LA-950,Sedigraph 5100,Atterberg圆筒,Coulter Multisizer 3,CIS-100,EyeTech以及图像分析软件Histolab。前四种仪器使用激光衍射。 Sedigraph和Atterberg圆柱体是基于沉积的。 Coulter Multisizer 3使用阻抗测量,最后三台仪器使用光学技术。对四种沉积物进行了粒度分析,这些沉积物的中值粒径分别约为35、30、12和9微米,并且没有大于90微米的颗粒。对于本研究中考虑的各种标准,激光衍射仪产生了最佳结果,其次是库尔特Multisizer 3(电感应区技术),沉降技术和光学方法。但是,研究还表明,没有“理想”方法之类的东西,因为技术可能会根据测试的标准得分不同。因此,适当的评估需要考虑各种标准。需要考虑的问题是:沉积物的类型,可用沉积物的数量,测量速度,测量方案的复杂性,数据的处理,结果的可重复性以及所研究的具体目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号