...
【24h】

Application accuracy of automatic registration in frameless stereotaxy.

机译:自动注册在无框立体定位中的应用准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We compared the application accuracy of an infrared-based neuronavigation system when used with a novel automatic registration with its application accuracy when standard fiducial-based registration is performed. METHODS: The automatic referencing tool is based on markers that are integrated in the headrest holder we routinely use in our intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) setting and can be detected by the navigation software automatically. For navigation targeting we used a Plexiglas phantom with 32 notched rods of different heights. The phantom was fixed in the head holder and multiple optimized gradient echo slices containing the clamp-integrated markers were acquired. After that we measured a T1 MPRAGE sequence with a slice thickness of 1.0 mm for navigation. The deepest points of the surface of the rods were defined as target points in image space. In three measurement series we referenced the phantom once with 4, once with 7 fiducials and twice automatically. In one serieswe performed only one automatic registration. The localization error was measured 3 times per rod and registration. RESULTS: The median localization errors for standard registration with 7 fiducials were between 1.2 and 3.05 mm. With 4 fiducials, medians were in the range from 1.87 to 2.21 mm. For the automatic registration we obtained median localization errors between 0.88 and 2.13 mm. In 6 of the 8 samples that were compared the automatic registration showed an application accuracy that was highly significantly better (p < 0.001 in most cases) than that of fiducial-based standard registration. CONCLUSION: The application accuracy found for automatic referencing is at least not worse than that for standard registration no matter whether 4 or 7 fiducial markers were used. Therefore, its use in the operating room is feasible. In combination with intraoperative MRI it may become a favorable alternative to standard fiducial-based registration especially when an intraoperative update of navigation data is necessary.
机译:目的:我们将基于红外线的神经导航系统与新型自动注册一起使用时的应用准确性与在进行基于标准基准的注册时的应用准确性进行了比较。方法:自动参考工具基于整合在我们通常在术中磁共振成像(MRI)设置中常用的头枕支架中的标记,并且可以由导航软件自动检测。对于导航目标,我们使用了Plexiglas幻影,该幻影带有32个不同高度的带槽杆。体模被固定在头部支架中,并获得了多个包含夹钳集成标记的优化梯度回波切片。之后,我们测量了厚度为1.0 mm的T1 MPRAGE序列用于导航。棒表面的最深点定义为图像空间中的目标点。在三个测量系列中,我们分别以4个和一个7个基准点引用了幻像,并自动引用了两次。在一个系列中,我们仅执行了一次自动注册。每个杆和定位测量3次定位误差。结果:7个基准点的标准注册的中位定位误差在1.2到3.05 mm之间。有4个基准,中位数在1.87到2.21毫米之间。对于自动套准,我们获得了0.88至2.13 mm的中位定位误差。在比较的8个样本中,有6个自动注册的应用准确性比基于基准的标准注册的准确性高得多(大多数情况下p <0.001)。结论:无论使用4或7个基准标记,用于自动参照的应用准确性至少不比标准配准更差。因此,其在手术室中的使用是可行的。与术中MRI结合使用时,它可能成为基于基准基准配准的理想替代方法,尤其是在需要术中更新导航数据时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号