...
首页> 外文期刊>Sports medicine >Precooling methods and their effects on athletic performance: A systematic review and practical applications
【24h】

Precooling methods and their effects on athletic performance: A systematic review and practical applications

机译:预冷方法及其对运动成绩的影响:系统综述和实际应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Precooling is a popular strategy used to combat the debilitating effects of heat-stress-induced fatigue and extend the period in which an individual can tolerate a heat-gaining environment. Interest in precooling prior to sporting activity has increased over the past three decades, with options including the application (external) and ingestion (internal) of cold modalities including air, water and/or ice, separately or in combination, immediately prior to exercise. Although many studies have observed improvements in exercise capacity or performance following precooling, some strategies are more logistically challenging than others, and thus are often impractical for use in competition or field settings. Objective: The purpose of this article was to comprehensively evaluate the established precooling literature, which addresses the application of cooling strategies that are likely to enhance field-based sports performance, while discussing the practical and logistical issues associated with these methods. We undertook a narrative examination that focused on the practical and event-specific application of precooling and its effect on physiological parameters and performance. Data sources: Relevant precooling literature was located through the PubMed database with second- and third-order reference lists manually cross matched for relevant journal articles. The last day of the literature search was 31 January 2012. Study selection: Relevant studies were included on the basis of conforming to strict criteria, including the following: (i) cooling was conducted before exercise; (ii) cooling was conducted during the performance task in a manner that was potentially achievable during sports competition; (iii) a measure of athletic performance was assessed; (iv) subjects included were able bodied, and free of diseases or disorders that would affect thermoregulation; (v) subjects were endurance-trained humans (maximal oxygen uptake [V? O2max] 50 ml/kg/min for endurance protocols); (vi) cooling was not performed on already hyperthermic subjects that were in immediate danger of heat-related illnesses or had received passive heating treatments; (vii) drink ingestion protocols were used for the intended purpose of benefiting thermoregulation as a result of beverage temperature; and (viii) investigations employed ≥ six subjects. Initial searches yielded 161 studies, but 106 were discarded on failing to meet the established criteria. This final summary evaluated 74 precooling treatments, across 55 studies employing well trained subjects. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Key physiological and performance information from each study was extracted and presented, and includes respective subject characteristics, detailed precooling methods, exercise protocols, environmental conditions, along with physiological and performance outcomes. Data were presented in comparison to respective control treatments. For studies that include more than one treatment intervention, the comparative results between each precooling treatment were also presented. The practical benefits and limitations of employing each strategy in the field and in relation to sports performance were summarized. Results: Clear evidence of the benefits for a range of precooling strategies undertaken in the laboratory setting exists, which suggest that these strategies could be employed by athletes who compete in hot environmental conditions to improve exercise safety, reduce their perceived thermal stress and improve sports performance. Limitations: This review did not include a systematic assessment of the study quality rating and provided a subjective assessment of the pooled outcomes of studies, which range in precooling methodologies and exercise outcomes. The wide range of research designs, precooling methods, environmental conditions and exercise protocols make it difficult to integrate all the available research into single findings. Conclusion: Most
机译:背景:预冷是一种流行的策略,用于对抗热应激引起的疲劳的衰弱影响并延长个人可以忍受热获取环境的时间。在过去的三十年中,人们对运动前进行预冷的兴趣有所增加,包括在运动前立即(外部)应用或摄入(内部)包括空气,水和/或冰的冷模式,包括单独或组合使用。尽管许多研究已经观察到预冷后运动能力或运动能力得到改善,但某些策略在逻辑上比其他策略更具挑战性,因此在比赛或田野环境中使用通常不切实际。目的:本文的目的是全面评估已建立的预冷文献,该文献探讨了可能增强田间体育表现的冷却策略,同时讨论了与这些方法相关的实际和后勤问题。我们进行了叙述性检查,重点是预冷的实际和针对特定事件的应用及其对生理参数和性能的影响。数据来源:相关的预冷文献是通过PubMed数据库找到的,其中的二阶和三阶参考列表与相关期刊文章手动交叉匹配。文献检索的最后一天是2012年1月31日。研究选择:在符合严格标准的基础上进行了相关研究,包括:(i)运动前进行冷却; (ii)在表演任务中以体育比赛中可能达到的方式进行冷却; (iii)评估运动成绩; (iv)包括的受试者身体健全,并且没有会影响体温调节的疾病或失调; (v)受试者是经耐力训练的人(对于耐力实验方案,最大摄氧量[V2 O2max]> 50 ml / kg / min); (vi)没有对已经处于热危险中或正在接受被动加热治疗的已经高温的受试者进行冷却; (vii)饮料摄入方案用于饮料温度引起的温度调节的预期目的; (viii)从事≥六个主题的调查。最初的搜索产生了161项研究,但由于未达到既定标准而被丢弃106项。该最终总结评估了55个采用受过良好训练的受试者的研究中的74种预冷处理。研究评估和综合方法:提取并介绍了每项研究的关键生理和表现信息,包括各自的受试者特征,详细的预冷方法,锻炼方案,环境条件以及生理和表现结果。给出了与各个对照治疗相比的数据。对于包括多个治疗干预措施的研究,还提供了每种预冷处理之间的比较结果。总结了在田间以及与运动表现有关的每种策略的实际利弊。结果:存在在实验室环境中采取的一系列预冷策略的好处的明确证据,这表明在炎热的环境条件下比赛的运动员可以采用这些策略,以改善运动安全性,减少感知的热应激并改善运动表现。局限性:该评价未包括对研究质量评级的系统评估,而是对研究的综合结果进行了主观评估,评估范围包括预冷方法和运动结果。广泛的研究设计,预冷方法,环境条件和锻炼规程使得很难将所有可用的研究整合到单个发现中。结论:大多数

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号