首页> 外文期刊>Modern rheumatology >Past hepatitis B virus infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biological and/or nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
【24h】

Past hepatitis B virus infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving biological and/or nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

机译:接受生物和/或非生物疾病改良抗风湿药的类风湿关节炎患者过去的乙肝病毒感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the prevalence of past infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the incidence of its reactivation under treatment with biological and/or nonbiological diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), 239 patients receiving DMARD therapy were consecutively enrolled and tested for HBV-DNA, using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay, HBV serology including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and serum levels of aminotransferase. Data prior to DMARD therapy and during follow-up were examined by reviewing medical records. Two patients (0.8%) were positive for HBsAg at the start of therapy. Sixty patients (25.1%) showed HBsAg-negative and anti- HBc-positive serology indicative of past HBV infection. Among these 60 patients, 2 patients (3.3%) experienced reactivation of viral replication (<2.1 log copies/ml) during DMARD therapy. One had been receiving tacrolimus, prednisolone, and methotrexate (MTX); the other had been treated with adalimumab, prednisolone, and MTX. Their serum aminotransferase levels remained normal, and HBsAg was negative. Ten weeks after reactivation of viral replication had been noted, the HBV-DNA titer in the former patient had increased to 2.9 log copies/ml, and HBsAg and hepatitis B e antigen had become weakly positive. In contrast, the latter patient had become negative for viral DNA without any antiviral prophylaxis. In conclusion, the use of biological and nonbiological DMARDs is relatively safe in most RA patients with past HBV infection, even when no anti-HBV prophylaxis is administered. Considering the high prevalence of past infection in RA patients and the high cost of prophylaxis against HBV reactivation, universal prophylaxis is impractical. Regular monitoring of serum viral DNA seems to be the most rational approach to preventing the development of clinically apparent hepatitis.
机译:为了评估类风湿关节炎(RA)患者过去感染乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)的患病率以及使用生物和/或非生物疾病改良抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗后其再活化的发生率,连续接受DMARD治疗的239名患者使用实时聚合酶链反应测定,HBV血清学(包括乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙型肝炎核心抗体(抗HBc))以及血清转氨酶水平,对HBV-DNA进行登记和测试。 DMARD治疗之前和随访期间的数据通过查阅病历进行检查。开始治疗时,有2例(0.8%)HBsAg阳性。 60名患者(25.1%)表现出HBsAg阴性和抗HBc阳性血清学,表明过去曾感染HBV。在这60例患者中,有2例(3.3%)在DMARD治疗期间经历了病毒复制的激活(<2.1 log拷贝/ ml)。其中一个正在接受他克莫司,泼尼松龙和甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的治疗;另一个已经用阿达木单抗,泼尼松龙和MTX治疗。他们的血清氨基转移酶水平保持正常,HBsAg为阴性。注意到病毒复制被重新激活十周后,该患者的HBV-DNA滴度已增加至2.9 log拷贝/ ml,并且HBsAg和乙型肝炎e抗原呈弱阳性。相反,后一患者的病毒DNA阴性,没有任何抗病毒预防措施。总而言之,即使没有进行抗-HBV预防措施,在大多数过去有HBV感染的RA患者中,使用生物和非生物DMARDs相对安全。考虑到RA患者过去感染的高发率和预防HBV激活的高昂费用,普遍预防是不切实际的。定期监测血清病毒DNA似乎是预防临床上明显的肝炎发展的最合理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号